StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. PDF.js vs fancybox

PDF.js vs fancybox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PDF.js
PDF.js
Stacks241
Followers86
Votes0
GitHub Stars52.2K
Forks10.5K
fancybox
fancybox
Stacks5.4K
Followers104
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.3K
Forks1.8K

PDF.js vs fancybox: What are the differences?

Introduction: When choosing between PDF.js and fancybox for displaying content on a website, it is important to understand their key differences to make an informed decision.

  1. Functionality: PDF.js is specifically designed for displaying PDF files within a web browser, providing features like page navigation, zooming, and text selection within the PDF. On the other hand, fancybox is a tool primarily used for creating modal dialog boxes that can display various types of content including images, videos, and inline HTML.

  2. Compatibility: PDF.js is compatible with most modern web browsers and operating systems, ensuring a consistent viewing experience for PDF files on different platforms. Fancybox, on the other hand, may have limitations in terms of compatibility depending on the type of content being displayed and the devices being used.

  3. Customization: PDF.js allows for some customization in terms of the appearance and behavior of the PDF viewer within the web page, but it is primarily focused on presenting PDF content in a standard format. Fancybox offers more customization options for the appearance and functionality of the modal dialog boxes, allowing for a more personalized user experience.

  4. Content Handling: PDF.js is optimized for handling PDF files specifically, providing a seamless viewing experience with features like search functionality and page thumbnails. Fancybox, while versatile in displaying different types of content, may not offer the same level of functionality for PDF files as PDF.js.

  5. Integration: PDF.js requires the integration of its script and dependencies to properly display PDF files on a website, which may require more technical setup and configuration. Fancybox, on the other hand, is easier to integrate and can be quickly implemented to display various types of content without as much setup required.

  6. Mobile Responsiveness: PDF.js is designed to be responsive and adapt to different screen sizes, ensuring that PDF files are displayed correctly on mobile devices. Fancybox also offers responsive design options, but the handling of content may vary depending on the type of content being displayed.

In Summary, PDF.js is more specialized for displaying PDF files with features like page navigation and text selection, while fancybox provides a versatile solution for creating modal dialog boxes with various types of content.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PDF.js
PDF.js
fancybox
fancybox

It is a Portable Document Format (PDF) viewer that is built with HTML5. It is community-driven and supported by Mozilla Labs. The goal is to create a general-purpose, web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs.

It is a tool that offers a nice and elegant way to add zooming functionality for images, html content and multi-media on your webpages. It is built on the top of the popular JavaScript framework jQuery and is both easy to implement and a snap to customize.

General-purpose;Platform for parsing and rendering PDFs;Built with HTML5
Looks great on every device; Swipe to navigate, spread/pinch to zoom in/out supported on touch devices;Supports most popular sites as YouTube, Vimeo and Google maps out of the box;It is possible to open a modal while another is still visible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
52.2K
GitHub Stars
7.3K
GitHub Forks
10.5K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
241
Stacks
5.4K
Followers
86
Followers
104
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
HTML5
HTML5
Google Maps
Google Maps
CSS 3
CSS 3
JavaScript
JavaScript
jQuery
jQuery

What are some alternatives to PDF.js, fancybox?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Lodash

Lodash

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase