StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Static Web Hosting
  5. Firebase Hosting vs GitHub Pages

Firebase Hosting vs GitHub Pages

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GitHub Pages
GitHub Pages
Stacks17.7K
Followers13.0K
Votes1.1K
Firebase Hosting
Firebase Hosting
Stacks181
Followers180
Votes10

Firebase Hosting vs GitHub Pages: What are the differences?

Introduction

Firebase Hosting and GitHub Pages are both popular options for hosting websites. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences between them that make each platform unique. This markdown code will provide a clear overview of these differences for users looking to choose the right hosting platform for their website.

  1. Deployment Process: Firebase Hosting makes it incredibly easy to deploy a website with just a few simple commands. It seamlessly integrates with Firebase's suite of tools and services, allowing users to deploy directly from their local development environment. On the other hand, GitHub Pages requires users to manually push their code to a GitHub repository, which then triggers the deployment process. This extra step adds some complexity and requires users to have knowledge of version control systems.

  2. Custom Domains: Both Firebase Hosting and GitHub Pages allow users to map custom domains to their websites. However, Firebase Hosting offers a more streamlined process with a straightforward configuration in the Firebase console. In contrast, GitHub Pages requires users to manually update DNS settings and create a separate CNAME file in their repository.

  3. Server-side Code Execution: Firebase Hosting does not support server-side code execution or server-side rendering. It is purely for hosting static files and serving them to visitors. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, supports server-side code execution through Jekyll, a static site generator. This allows users to include dynamic content and create more complex websites.

  4. Access Control: Firebase Hosting provides built-in access control mechanisms that allow users to restrict access to their website. It supports Firebase Authentication, which enables users to require authentication for certain pages or sections of their site. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, does not provide any built-in access control features. Users must rely on other methods, such as implementing their own authentication system.

  5. Usage Limitations: Firebase Hosting has some usage limitations in terms of bandwidth and storage. The free plan has a storage limit of 10GB and a bandwidth limit of 360GB per month. These limitations can be increased by upgrading to a paid plan. In comparison, GitHub Pages has more generous usage limits, offering 100GB of storage and 100GB per month of bandwidth for the free plan.

  6. Integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) Tools: Firebase Hosting is tightly integrated with Firebase's CI/CD pipeline, making it easy to set up automated deployments. Users can connect their hosting project to their GitHub repository or use other CI/CD tools like Jenkins or CircleCI. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, provides flexibility in choosing CI/CD tools. Users can integrate with any CI/CD pipeline that supports Git, allowing for more customization.

In Summary, Firebase Hosting offers an easier deployment process, seamless integration with Firebase services, and built-in access control mechanisms, while GitHub Pages allows for server-side code execution, has more generous usage limits, and provides flexibility in choosing CI/CD tools. Choose Firebase Hosting for a simplified hosting experience with Firebase ecosystem integration or GitHub Pages for more advanced functionality and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on GitHub Pages, Firebase Hosting

Howie
Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

DecidedonNetlifyNetlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

  • Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
  • With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub Pages
GitHub Pages
Firebase Hosting
Firebase Hosting

Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.

It is production-grade web content hosting for developers. With a single command, you can quickly deploy web apps and serve both static and dynamic content to a global CDN (content delivery network). You can also pair it with Cloud Functions or Cloud Run to build and host microservices.

Blogging with Jekyll; Custom URLs; Automatic Page Generator
-
Statistics
Stacks
17.7K
Stacks
181
Followers
13.0K
Followers
180
Votes
1.1K
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 290
    Free
  • 217
    Right out of github
  • 185
    Quick to set up
  • 108
    Instant
  • 107
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 4
    Not possible to perform HTTP redirects
  • 3
    Supports only Jekyll
  • 3
    Limited Jekyll plugins
  • 1
    Jekyll is bloated
Pros
  • 4
    Integration with firebase
  • 1
    Analytics
  • 1
    Custom domain setup
  • 1
    Free SSL Support
  • 1
    Multi-site hosting support
Cons
  • 1
    .env complexity
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub Pages, Firebase Hosting?

DomainRacer

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Vercel

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Surge

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Webflow

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Divshot

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

GitLab Pages

GitLab Pages

Host your static websites on GitLab.com for free, or on your own GitLab Enterprise Edition instance. Use any static website generator: Jekyll, Middleman, Hexo, Hugo, Pelican, and more

Runkod

Runkod

It provides decentralized hosting platform and management tools for modern javascript applications and static web publishing.

BitBalloon

BitBalloon

BitBalloon deploys static sites from development to production in one step. Sites are automatically compressed, cached and pushed to a CDN. Any forms on the site will automatically work. BitBalloon is 100% programmable, everything from deployment to form handling can be controlled through the API. White label reseller options are available for using BitBalloon as a site publishing engine inside 3rd party authoring tools.

Spigot

Spigot

It is home to the community behind the biggest Minecraft server software projects and provides a place for everyone involved with Minecraft servers to connect with each other whether they seeking help and support or sharing and showcasing their work. We provide a web forum, chat room and wiki for providing support as well as project hosting for content creators and hope that you too will become involved in this extensive and growing community of more than 300,000 members.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope