Overview

Microsoft IIS

Stacks15.5K

Followers7.7K

Votes236

GeoServer

Stacks91

Followers82

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.2K

Forks2.3K

GeoServer vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key differences between GeoServer and Microsoft IIS in a website format:

1. **Operating System Compatibility**: GeoServer is compatible with various operating systems like Windows, MacOS, and Unix/Linux, whereas Microsoft IIS is primarily designed to run on Windows operating systems.
2. **Functionality**: GeoServer is specifically designed for serving geospatial data and maps, providing features like WMS, WFS, and WCS services. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS is a web server focused on hosting websites and web applications, offering features for ASP.NET and other web technologies.
3. **Licensing**: GeoServer is an open-source software released under the GNU General Public License (GPL), allowing users to modify and distribute the software freely. Microsoft IIS, however, is a proprietary software that requires licensing fees for commercial use.
4. **Community Support**: GeoServer has a strong community of developers and users contributing to its continuous development and support. In contrast, Microsoft IIS has support primarily from Microsoft and a smaller user community. 
5. **Performance**: GeoServer is optimized for handling geospatial data and maps efficiently, providing better performance in serving spatial data requests. Microsoft IIS, while capable of handling web content effectively, may not offer the same level of performance specifically for geospatial data.
6. **Scalability**: GeoServer is designed to scale horizontally by distributing workloads across multiple servers, making it suitable for handling large volumes of geospatial data. Microsoft IIS can also be scaled horizontally, but its scalability may be more limited compared to GeoServer in handling complex geospatial data tasks.

In Summary, the key differences between GeoServer and Microsoft IIS lie in their compatibility, functionality, licensing, community support, performance, and scalability. GeoServer caters specifically to geospatial data handling, while Microsoft IIS focuses on web hosting and application deployment.

🔥 Trending in Platform as a Service on StackShare

Daytona Platform As A Service

The open source development environment manager

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

6

Advice on Microsoft IIS, GeoServer

greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS	GeoServer
Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.	It is developed, tested, and supported as community-driven project by a diverse group of individuals and organizations. It is designed for interoperability, it publishes data from any major spatial data source using open standards.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 4.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 15.5K	Stacks 91
Followers 7.7K	Followers 82
Votes 236	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 83 Great with .net 55 I'm forced to use iis 27 Use nginx 18 Azure integration 15 Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit Cons 1 Hard to set up	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, GeoServer?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.