StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Puma vs gevent

Puma vs gevent

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Puma
Puma
Stacks1.2K
Followers265
Votes20
GitHub Stars7.8K
Forks1.5K
gevent
gevent
Stacks260
Followers52
Votes0

Puma vs gevent: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Puma and gevent

Puma and gevent are both popular choices for server applications in Ruby and Python, respectively. While they both serve the same purpose, they have distinct differences that set them apart. Below are the key differences between Puma and gevent:

1. **Concurrency Model**: Puma utilizes a multi-process model, where each client connection is handled by a separate process, allowing for true parallel processing. On the other hand, gevent uses a greenlet-based concurrency model, which runs multiple greenlets (similar to lightweight threads) within the same process, enabling high concurrency with minimal overhead.

2. **Programming Language**: Puma is specifically designed for Ruby applications, providing a stable and reliable server solution for Ruby developers. In contrast, gevent is a Python library that brings asynchronous event-driven programming to Python applications, making it a popular choice among Python developers for handling high concurrency tasks.

3. **Performance Optimization**: Puma is optimized for performance in Ruby applications, offering a balance between speed and memory usage by managing multiple processes efficiently. Meanwhile, gevent excels in I/O-bound tasks by using lightweight green threads to handle thousands of connections simultaneously, making it ideal for network applications with heavy I/O operations.

4. **Community Support**: Puma has a strong community support base within the Ruby ecosystem, with regular updates and bug fixes to ensure the stability of the server. On the other hand, gevent has a vibrant community of Python developers who contribute to its development, providing additional features and enhancements to meet the evolving needs of the Python community.

5. **Ease of Use**: Puma is known for its ease of deployment and configuration in Ruby applications, making it a straightforward choice for developers looking for a reliable server solution. In contrast, gevent may have a steeper learning curve due to its asynchronous programming model, requiring developers to familiarize themselves with greenlets and event loops for effective implementation.

6. **Compatibility**: Puma is compatible with various Ruby web frameworks such as Ruby on Rails and Sinatra, ensuring seamless integration for Ruby developers. On the other hand, gevent is compatible with a wide range of Python libraries and frameworks, making it a versatile choice for Python developers working on diverse applications.

In Summary, Puma and gevent differ in their concurrency models, programming languages, performance optimizations, community support, ease of use, and compatibility, catering to the specific needs and preferences of Ruby and Python developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Puma
Puma
gevent
gevent

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

It is a coroutine -based Python networking library that uses greenlet to provide a high-level synchronous API on top of the libev or libuv event loop.

-
Fast event loop based on libev or libuv; Lightweight execution units based on greenlets; API that re-uses concepts from the Python standard library (for examples there are events and queues); Cooperative sockets with SSL support; Cooperative DNS queries performed through a threadpool, dnspython, or c-ares; Monkey patching utility to get 3rd party modules to become cooperative; TCP/UDP/HTTP servers; Subprocess support (through gevent.subprocess); Thread pools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
260
Followers
265
Followers
52
Votes
20
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Free
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Convenient
  • 2
    Default Rails server
  • 2
    Multithreaded
Cons
  • 0
    Uses `select` (limited client count)
Cons
  • 1
    Not native
Integrations
No integrations available
Django
Django
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Puma, gevent?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase