StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. GlassFish vs Oracle Weblogic Server

GlassFish vs Oracle Weblogic Server

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GlassFish
GlassFish
Stacks581
Followers112
Votes0
Oracle Weblogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Server
Stacks145
Followers112
Votes0

GlassFish vs Oracle Weblogic Server: What are the differences?

Introduction

In a website environment, it is crucial to choose the right application server for hosting web applications. Two popular options in the Java ecosystem are GlassFish and Oracle Weblogic Server. While both serve as Java EE application servers, they have some key differences that can impact the decision-making process.

  1. Ease of Use and Configuration: GlassFish, being an open-source server, offers a simpler installation process and a user-friendly administration console. On the other hand, Oracle Weblogic Server provides more advanced features and capabilities, but its setup and configuration can be more complex and require a deeper understanding.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Oracle Weblogic Server is known for its superior scalability and performance capabilities, making it a preferred choice for enterprises with high-demand applications. It has robust clustering and load-balancing features, which allow for better resource allocation and optimal application performance. In comparison, while GlassFish is also capable of scaling horizontally, it may not offer the same level of scalability and performance as Weblogic.

  3. Support and Maintenance: Oracle Weblogic Server is a commercially supported product, which means that users can obtain professional support directly from Oracle. GlassFish, being an open-source project, relies more on community support and may have limited official technical assistance available. Therefore, organizations that prioritize reliable support and maintenance may lean towards Weblogic.

  4. Features and Functionality: Oracle Weblogic Server provides a comprehensive set of features and advanced capabilities, including support for advanced security features, high availability, and failover mechanisms. It also offers integration with other Oracle products. GlassFish, while feature-rich, may lack some of the more advanced capabilities offered by Weblogic.

  5. Licensing and Cost: GlassFish is an open-source project licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), which means it is free to use and distribute. Oracle Weblogic Server, on the other hand, is a commercial product that requires license fees, particularly for larger deployments. Therefore, organizations with budget constraints or smaller-scale projects may prefer GlassFish for its cost-effectiveness.

  6. Maturity and Adoption: Oracle Weblogic Server has been around longer and has a more established presence in enterprise environments. It is widely adopted by large enterprises and known for its stability and reliability. GlassFish, although gaining popularity, may still be considered relatively younger and may not have the same level of maturity and wide-scale adoption as Weblogic.

In Summary, GlassFish offers ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and a strong open-source community, while Oracle Weblogic Server provides advanced features, scalability, professional support, and better integration with other Oracle products. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific requirements, budget, and preferences of the organization or project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GlassFish
GlassFish
Oracle Weblogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Server

An Application Server means, It can manage Java EE applications You should use GlassFish for Java EE enterprise applications. The need for a seperate Web server is mostly needed in a production environment.

An application server for building and deploying enterprise Java EE applications with support for new features for lowering cost of operations, improving performance, enhancing scalability and supporting the Oracle Applications portfolio.

-
Java EE full platform support;High performance clustering;
Statistics
Stacks
581
Stacks
145
Followers
112
Followers
112
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to GlassFish, Oracle Weblogic Server?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase