StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. GlassFish vs XAMPP

GlassFish vs XAMPP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

XAMPP
XAMPP
Stacks142
Followers272
Votes6
GlassFish
GlassFish
Stacks581
Followers112
Votes0

GlassFish vs XAMPP: What are the differences?

Key Differences between GlassFish and XAMPP

GlassFish and XAMPP are both web server solutions, but they have some key differences. Let's explore these differences in detail:

  1. Architecture: GlassFish is a fully Java EE-compliant application server, while XAMPP is a software package that includes multiple components, such as Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB, and PHP. Therefore, GlassFish provides a more integrated and comprehensive platform for Java-based web applications, whereas XAMPP offers a more modular and customizable structure.

  2. Development Environment: GlassFish provides a robust development environment with tools like NetBeans IDE, which offers extensive support for Java Enterprise Edition development. On the other hand, XAMPP is primarily designed for local development and testing purposes, making it easier to set up a development environment quickly.

  3. Scalability: GlassFish is designed to handle large-scale enterprise applications and can scale horizontally by adding more server instances. It supports features like clustering and load balancing, making it suitable for demanding environments. In contrast, XAMPP is more suitable for small to medium-sized websites or applications and may not offer the same level of scalability.

  4. Supported Technologies: GlassFish is a Java EE application server, supporting Java-based technologies like Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB), JavaServer Faces (JSF), and Java Servlets. XAMPP, on the other hand, supports a wide range of technologies, including PHP, Perl, and MySQL, making it more versatile for web development across different platforms.

  5. Administration and Monitoring: GlassFish provides a web-based administration console that allows easy management and monitoring of the server and applications. It offers features like server monitoring, logging, and security configuration. XAMPP, however, primarily relies on command-line tools and configuration files for administration and may not offer the same level of convenience and ease of use.

  6. Deployment Flexibility: GlassFish supports Java EE deployment specifications, offering features like resource management, transactional support, and centralized deployment descriptors. XAMPP, on the other hand, provides a simpler deployment process for web applications, mainly relying on file copying and configuration changes.

In summary, GlassFish is a feature-rich Java EE application server designed for enterprise-level applications, offering comprehensive development and deployment capabilities. XAMPP, on the other hand, is a modular web server package suitable for smaller projects and provides a flexible environment for different web technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

XAMPP
XAMPP
GlassFish
GlassFish

It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.

An Application Server means, It can manage Java EE applications You should use GlassFish for Java EE enterprise applications. The need for a seperate Web server is mostly needed in a production environment.

Statistics
Stacks
142
Stacks
581
Followers
272
Followers
112
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Easy set up and installation of files
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to XAMPP, GlassFish?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase