StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Go Modules Packages
  5. nfs vs webdav

nfs vs webdav

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

nfs
nfs
Stacks2
Followers2
Votes0
GitHub Stars103.4K
Forks38.4K
webdav
webdav
Stacks2
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks1.1K

nfs vs webdav: What are the differences?

  1. Key Difference 1: File System vs Protocol:

    • NFS (Network File System) is a file system protocol that allows users to access files and directories over a network, as if they were stored locally on their own machine. It provides a way for remote systems to mount file systems over a network and access shared files and directories.
    • WebDAV (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning) is a protocol that allows clients to perform operations on remote resources over HTTP. It extends the HTTP protocol to provide functionalities like file management, version control, and keywords for collaboration.
  2. Key Difference 2: Access Control:

    • NFS uses file permissions and Access Control Lists (ACLs) to control access to files and directories. The access control is managed by the NFS server, and the client must abide by the permissions set by the server.
    • WebDAV has its own access control mechanism, which allows for granular access control on individual resources. WebDAV also supports authentication mechanisms like Basic, Digest, and OAuth.
  3. Key Difference 3: Performance and Speed:

    • NFS operates at the file system level, making it faster and more efficient for accessing files and directories. It utilizes caching mechanisms to minimize network traffic and improve performance.
    • WebDAV operates at the protocol level, which introduces additional overhead and may result in slower performance compared to NFS. While WebDAV supports caching, it may not be as efficient as the built-in caching mechanisms of NFS.
  4. Key Difference 4: Platform Compatibility:

    • NFS is primarily designed for UNIX-like operating systems, such as Linux and Solaris. It is widely supported on these platforms, making it easy to share files and directories between machines running compatible operating systems.
    • WebDAV, on the other hand, is a platform-independent protocol that can be used on a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and more. It provides interoperability between different platforms and can be used with various web servers and clients.
  5. Key Difference 5: Access Methods:

    • NFS provides shared access to files and directories, allowing multiple clients to access and modify the same resources simultaneously. It uses a client-server model, where the server holds the files and clients make requests to access them.
    • WebDAV provides more flexible access methods, allowing clients to access and manipulate files and resources individually. It supports methods like GET, PUT, DELETE, MOVE, COPY, and more, making it suitable for web-based collaboration and content management.
  6. Key Difference 6: Network Requirements:

    • NFS operates at a lower network layer (typically using TCP/IP) and requires a dedicated network to establish connectivity between the server and clients. It may require additional networking configurations like firewall rules, network mounts, and IP addressing.
    • WebDAV operates over HTTP or HTTPS, using the existing infrastructure of the web. It can leverage standard web ports and protocols, making it easier to use over the internet and behind firewalls. It doesn't require dedicated network configurations specific to the protocol.

In Summary, NFS is a file system protocol primarily designed for UNIX-like systems, providing fast and efficient shared access to files and directories, while WebDAV is a protocol that extends HTTP to offer file management functionalities, version control, collaboration features, and platform independence.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

nfs
nfs
webdav
webdav

Production-Grade Container Scheduling and Management.

Go supplementary network libraries.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
103.4K
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Forks
38.4K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
2
Stacks
2
Followers
2
Followers
0
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to nfs, webdav?

go

go

Google Cloud Client Libraries for Go.

proto

proto

Go support for Google's protocol buffers.

cloudflare

cloudflare

Cloudflare This package provides the package which offers an interface to the CloudFlare gAPI.

net

net

Go supplementary network libraries.

sys

sys

Go packages for low-level interaction with the operating system.

fsnotify

fsnotify

Cross-platform file system notifications for Go.

aws

aws

AWS SDK for the Go programming language.

text

text

Go text processing support.

assertion

assertion

Ginkgo's Preferred Matcher Library.

crypto

crypto

Go supplementary cryptography libraries.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase