StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Gunicorn vs Mongoose Web Server

Gunicorn vs Mongoose Web Server

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mongoose Web Server
Mongoose Web Server
Stacks12
Followers37
Votes3
GitHub Stars12.3K
Forks2.9K
Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K

Gunicorn vs Mongoose Web Server: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Gunicorn and Mongoose Web Server are both popular web server options, but they have some key differences that set them apart. 

1. **Concurrency Model**: Gunicorn is designed to work with Python WSGI applications and is based on the pre-fork worker model, which uses multiple worker processes to handle incoming requests. On the other hand, Mongoose Web Server uses an event-driven, single-threaded model which can handle a large number of connections efficiently.
   
2. **Language Support**: Gunicorn is specifically built for Python applications, while Mongoose Web Server supports a broader range of languages including C, C++, JavaScript, and Python. This makes Mongoose more versatile for organizations using multiple programming languages in their projects.

3. **Resource Usage**: Gunicorn typically consumes more system resources due to its multi-process model, while Mongoose Web Server is more lightweight and has lower resource consumption, making it suitable for embedded systems or environments with limited resources.

4. **Configuration**: Gunicorn requires explicit configuration for settings like the number of workers, timeouts, and log levels, which can sometimes be challenging for beginners. In contrast, Mongoose Web Server is known for its simple and easy-to-configure setup, making it a preferred choice for those looking for a hassle-free deployment process.

5. **SSL/TLS Support**: Gunicorn requires additional setup and configuration for SSL/TLS support, while Mongoose Web Server comes with built-in support for SSL/TLS encryption, making it convenient for securing web applications without the need for extensive configuration.

6. **Community and Maintenance**: Gunicorn has a larger and more established community with regular updates and support, ensuring its reliability and stability. Mongoose Web Server, although actively maintained, may have a smaller user base and community compared to Gunicorn, which could impact the availability of resources and assistance when needed.

In Summary, Gunicorn and Mongoose Web Server differ in their concurrency models, language support, resource usage, configuration ease, SSL/TLS support, and community size and maintenance level.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mongoose Web Server
Mongoose Web Server
Gunicorn
Gunicorn

Mongoose is built on top of Libmongoose embedded library, which can turn anything into a web server in 5 minutes worth of effort and few lines of code. Libmongoose is used to serve Web GUI on embedded devices, implement RESTful services, RPC frameworks (e.g. JSON-RPC), handle telemetry data exchange, and perform many other tasks in various different industries including aerospace, manufacturing, finance, research, automotive, gaming, IT.

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.3K
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Forks
2.9K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
Stacks
12
Stacks
1.3K
Followers
37
Followers
908
Votes
3
Votes
78
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Easy to configure
  • 1
    Web server
  • 1
    Light weight
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Light

What are some alternatives to Mongoose Web Server, Gunicorn?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase