StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Gunicorn vs Waitress

Gunicorn vs Waitress

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K
Waitress
Waitress
Stacks16
Followers58
Votes7
GitHub Stars1.5K
Forks182

Gunicorn vs Waitress: What are the differences?

Gunicorn and Waitress are both Python web servers used for deploying web applications. Here are the key differences between the two.

  1. Concurrency Model: Gunicorn follows a pre-fork worker model, where a master process forks multiple worker processes to handle incoming requests. This approach allows for efficient utilization of resources by utilizing multiple CPU cores effectively. On the other hand, Waitress employs a multi-threaded architecture, using threads to handle concurrent requests. This model is typically suited for I/O-bound applications.

  2. Scalability: Gunicorn offers better scalability compared to Waitress, especially for CPU-bound applications. By utilizing multiple worker processes, Gunicorn can handle a higher number of requests concurrently and distribute the load across multiple cores. Waitress, on the other hand, is more suitable for scenarios where the number of concurrent clients is relatively lower.

  3. Configuration Options: Gunicorn provides a wide range of configuration options, allowing finer control over various server parameters. These options include the number of worker processes, worker class, timeout settings, and more. Waitress, on the other hand, offers a simpler configuration setup with fewer customizable parameters.

  4. Ease of Use: Waitress is designed to be lightweight and easy to use. Its simplicity makes it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications with straightforward deployment requirements. Gunicorn, on the other hand, may require more effort in configuration and setup, but it also offers more flexibility and advanced features.

  5. Supported WSGI Standards: Gunicorn supports both the WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface) and ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) standards, providing compatibility with a wide range of Python web frameworks. Waitress, on the other hand, primarily focuses on supporting the WSGI standard and may not be suitable for applications that rely on the ASGI protocol.

  6. Performance: In terms of performance, Gunicorn is often considered faster and more efficient compared to Waitress. The pre-fork worker model used by Gunicorn allows it to handle a higher number of concurrent requests efficiently, especially for CPU-bound workloads. However, Waitress can still provide good performance for I/O-bound applications.

In summary, Gunicorn is a pre-fork server known for its ability to handle concurrent requests efficiently, often used with various web frameworks, while Waitress is a simpler, production-ready server focusing on simplicity and ease of use, suitable for smaller applications and scenarios where lightweight performance is a priority.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Waitress
Waitress

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

It is meant to be a production-quality pure-Python WSGI server with very acceptable performance. It has no dependencies except ones which live in the Python standard library. It runs on CPython on Unix and Windows under Python 2.7+ and Python 3.4+. It is also known to run on PyPy 1.6.0 on UNIX.

-
Production-quality WSGI server ; Dont hang a thread up trying to send data to slow clients;Use self.logger to log socket errors instead of self.log_info (normalize); Remove pointless handle_error method from channel; Queue requests instead of tasks in a channel
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Stars
1.5K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
182
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
16
Followers
908
Followers
58
Votes
78
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Light
Pros
  • 2
    Runs on Windows
  • 1
    Light
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Cross Platform
  • 1
    Reliable
Integrations
No integrations available
Windows
Windows
Python
Python
Flask
Flask

What are some alternatives to Gunicorn, Waitress?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase