StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Gunicorn vs Wildfly

Gunicorn vs Wildfly

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K
Wildfly
Wildfly
Stacks187
Followers226
Votes6

Gunicorn vs Wildfly: What are the differences?

  1. Scalability: Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model HTTP server while Wildfly is a Java-based application server utilizing an underlying thread model for handling requests. This difference impacts how each server scales with a high number of requests, with Gunicorn typically being more efficient in managing multiple concurrent connections.

  2. Language Support: Gunicorn is primarily designed to work with Python applications while Wildfly is utilized for Java applications. This distinction in language support determines the compatibility of the server with different types of applications and frameworks.

  3. Configuration: Gunicorn is often configured through command-line arguments or configuration files while Wildfly utilizes a centralized configuration mechanism that includes XML files. This difference in configuration methods affects the ease of setup and maintenance for each server.

  4. Deployment Environment: Gunicorn is commonly used in conjunction with a reverse proxy server like Nginx or Apache for load balancing and serving static files, whereas Wildfly is a standalone application server that provides all necessary functionalities for deploying Java applications. This distinction influences the deployment architecture and setup required for each server.

  5. Performance: Gunicorn is known for its speed and efficiency in serving Python applications, while Wildfly offers robust features and capabilities suited for enterprise-level Java applications. This difference in performance characteristics can impact the choice of server based on the specific requirements of the application.

  6. Community and Support: Gunicorn has a large and active community of users and contributors in the Python programming ecosystem, providing ample resources and support for users. In contrast, Wildfly has a strong community within the Java development community, offering specialized assistance and resources for Java application developers. This difference in community support can affect the availability of resources for troubleshooting and optimizing server performance.

In Summary, Gunicorn is optimized for scalability and speed in serving Python applications, while Wildfly is tailored for enterprise-level Java applications with a robust set of features and community support tailored to Java development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Wildfly
Wildfly

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

It is a flexible, lightweight, managed application runtime that helps you build amazing applications. It supports the latest standards for web development.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
187
Followers
908
Followers
226
Votes
78
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Light
  • 3
    Fast
Pros
  • 3
    Java
  • 3
    Eclipse integration
Integrations
No integrations available
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Gunicorn, Wildfly?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase