StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Lodash vs hammer.js

Lodash vs hammer.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lodash
Lodash
Stacks10.7K
Followers886
Votes3
GitHub Stars61.3K
Forks7.1K
hammer.js
hammer.js
Stacks39
Followers16
Votes0
GitHub Stars24.4K
Forks2.6K

Lodash vs hammer.js: What are the differences?

Lodash vs hammer.js

Lodash and hammer.js are two popular JavaScript libraries with distinct functionalities. While Lodash is a utility library that provides helpful functions for common programming tasks, hammer.js is a library specifically designed for touch gestures on websites.

  1. Functionality: Lodash offers a wide range of functions that cover various aspects of JavaScript programming, such as manipulating arrays, objects, strings, and numbers. It also provides utility functions for working with functions, collections, and other generic tasks. In contrast, hammer.js focuses solely on touch gestures, providing gestures recognition, touch event management, and touch input simulation capabilities.

  2. Dependencies: Lodash is a standalone library and does not have any specific dependencies. It can be easily integrated into any JavaScript project. On the other hand, hammer.js has a dependency on the jQuery library. Therefore, in order to use hammer.js, jQuery must first be included in the project.

  3. Supported Gestures: Hammer.js provides support for a wide range of touch gestures, such as tap, double tap, swipe, pinch, rotate, press, and pan. These gestures can be easily detected and used in web applications. In contrast, Lodash does not include any built-in touch gesture recognition capabilities.

  4. Compatibility: Lodash is designed to work across different JavaScript environments, including Node.js and modern web browsers. It provides consistent behavior and performance regardless of the environment. Hammer.js, on the other hand, is primarily focused on touch gestures in web environments and may not be as suitable for other use cases.

  5. Community and Support: Lodash has a large and active community of developers, which translates to a wealth of available resources, documentation, and support. It is widely adopted and has a strong reputation for reliability and performance. Hammer.js also has a dedicated community, but it may not be on the same scale as Lodash.

  6. Size and Performance: Lodash is a comprehensive library with a considerable size, especially when including all its functions. However, it provides high performance due to its optimized algorithms. Hammer.js is relatively smaller in size as it focuses on touch gestures only. Its performance is also optimized for handling touch events efficiently.

In summary, Lodash and hammer.js are two JavaScript libraries with distinct functionalities. Lodash provides utility functions for general JavaScript programming tasks, while hammer.js specializes in touch gesture recognition and touch event management for web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Lodash, hammer.js

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.4k views38.4k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash
Lodash
hammer.js
hammer.js

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

It is a open-source library that can recognize gestures made by touch, mouse and pointerEvents. It doesn’t have any dependencies.

-
No dependencies;Open Source; Multi-touch gestures
Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.3K
GitHub Stars
24.4K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
GitHub Forks
2.6K
Stacks
10.7K
Stacks
39
Followers
886
Followers
16
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Better than Underscore
  • 1
    Simple
  • 0
    Better that Underscore
Cons
  • 1
    It reduce the performance
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Opera Browser
Opera Browser
AngularJS
AngularJS
JavaScript
JavaScript
jQuery
jQuery
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Lodash, hammer.js?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase