htmz vs Java

Pros of htmz

Pros of Java

• 605

  Great libraries
• 446

  Widely used
• 401

  Excellent tooling
• 396

  Huge amount of documentation available
• 334

  Large pool of developers available
• 209

  Open source
• 203

  Excellent performance
• 158

  Great development
• 150

  Used for android
• 148

  Vast array of 3rd party libraries
• 61

  Compiled Language
• 53

  Used for Web
• 47

  High Performance
• 46

  Managed memory
• 45

  Native threads
• 43

  Statically typed
• 35

  Easy to read
• 33

  Great Community
• 29

  Reliable platform
• 24

  Sturdy garbage collection
• 24

  JVM compatibility
• 22

  Cross Platform Enterprise Integration
• 20

  Good amount of APIs
• 20

  Universal platform
• 18

  Great Support
• 14

  Great ecosystem
• 11

  Lots of boilerplate
• 11

  Backward compatible
• 10

  Everywhere
• 9

  Excellent SDK - JDK
• 7

  Static typing
• 7

  Cross-platform
• 7

  It's Java
• 6

  Mature language thus stable systems
• 6

  Better than Ruby
• 6

  Long term language
• 6

  Portability
• 5

  Clojure
• 5

  Vast Collections Library
• 5

  Used for Android development
• 4

  Best martial for design
• 4

  Most developers favorite
• 4

  Old tech
• 3

  Javadoc
• 3

  History
• 3

  Testable
• 3

  Great Structure
• 3

  Stable platform, which many new languages depend on
• 2

  Type Safe
• 2

  Faster than python
• 0

  Job

Cons of htmz

Cons of Java

• 33

  Verbosity
• 27

  NullpointerException
• 17

  Nightmare to Write
• 16

  Overcomplexity is praised in community culture
• 12

  Boiler plate code
• 8

  Classpath hell prior to Java 9
• 6

  No REPL
• 4

  No property
• 3

  Code are too long
• 2

  Non-intuitive generic implementation
• 2

  There is not optional parameter
• 2

  Floating-point errors
• 1

  Java's too statically, stronglly, and strictly typed
• 1

  Returning Wildcard Types
• 1

  Terrbible compared to Python/Batch Perormence