StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. JBoss vs JSP

JBoss vs JSP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JBoss
JBoss
Stacks457
Followers255
Votes0
JSP
JSP
Stacks28
Followers13
Votes0

JBoss vs JSP: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing JBoss and JavaServer Pages (JSP), it is crucial to understand the key differences between these technologies. JBoss is an open-source application server used for deploying Java-based web applications, while JSP is a technology used for creating dynamic web pages in Java.

  1. Deployment Model: JBoss is a full-fledged application server that provides a comprehensive environment for deploying and running Java applications. On the other hand, JSP is a technology that runs within a web container, typically integrated with a servlet container like Apache Tomcat.

  2. Functionality: JBoss offers a wide range of features such as clustering, caching, messaging, and transaction management, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. In contrast, JSP focuses solely on generating dynamic content within web pages using Java code embedded in HTML.

  3. Scalability: JBoss provides scalability features like load balancing and clustering to handle high volumes of traffic and ensure reliable performance. JSP, being a technology for creating dynamic web pages, does not inherently provide scalability features but can leverage the underlying application server's scalability capabilities.

  4. Development Approach: When developing applications with JBoss, developers often need to use additional frameworks and tools to build and deploy applications effectively. In contrast, JSP allows developers to embed Java code directly into HTML files, simplifying the development process for dynamic web pages.

  5. Technical Expertise Requirement: Setting up and configuring a JBoss application server typically requires more technical expertise due to its comprehensive features and configuration options. On the other hand, working with JSP for creating dynamic web pages may require a solid understanding of Java programming concepts but is generally less complex than managing an application server like JBoss.

  6. Community Support: JBoss has a large and active open-source community that provides resources, documentation, and support for users. While JSP also benefits from the broader Java community, it is often integrated into various web frameworks and development tools that offer additional support and resources.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between JBoss and JSP is essential for choosing the appropriate technology for developing and deploying Java-based web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JBoss
JBoss
JSP
JSP

An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.

The official Twitter account for the sum of all knowledge, Wikipedia. Overseen by @jeffelder.

Statistics
Stacks
457
Stacks
28
Followers
255
Followers
13
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to JBoss, JSP?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase