JBoss vs Microsoft IIS

Overview

Microsoft IIS

Stacks15.5K

Followers7.7K

Votes236

JBoss

Stacks457

Followers255

Votes0

JBoss vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?

Comparison between JBoss and Microsoft IIS

JBoss and Microsoft IIS are both popular web server platforms used for hosting websites and web applications. However, they have significant differences in terms of features, architecture, and performance. In this article, we will highlight the key differences between JBoss and Microsoft IIS.

Architecture: JBoss is built on the Java EE platform, which makes it more suitable for hosting Java-based applications. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS is built on the Windows Server platform, making it ideal for hosting applications developed using .NET framework.
Operating System Compatibility: JBoss is compatible with various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. It provides flexibility for developers to choose the operating system that suits their requirements. In contrast, Microsoft IIS is specifically designed for the Windows operating system and offers seamless integration with other Microsoft technologies.
Open Source vs Proprietary: JBoss is an open-source application server, which means it is freely available and allows for customization and extension of features. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS is a proprietary web server that requires a license for commercial usage, limiting the ability to modify or customize its functionalities.
Performance and Scalability: JBoss is known for its high performance and scalability, especially when it comes to handling heavy workloads and concurrent user requests. It utilizes a multi-threaded architecture and supports clustering for load balancing. Microsoft IIS also performs well but is more suitable for smaller workloads compared to JBoss.
Community and Support: JBoss has a strong and active community of developers who contribute to its development, provide support, and share knowledge through forums and communities. Microsoft IIS also has a community, but it is relatively smaller compared to JBoss. However, Microsoft offers comprehensive technical support for IIS through its customer support channels.
Integration with Development Tools and Technologies: JBoss integrates well with various Java development tools, frameworks, and technologies, making it an ideal choice for Java-based applications. Microsoft IIS, on the other hand, offers seamless integration with Microsoft development tools like Microsoft Visual Studio, ASP.NET, and other .NET-related technologies.

In Summary, JBoss and Microsoft IIS differ in terms of architecture, operating system compatibility, licensing, performance, community support, and integration with development tools and technologies. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the application and the development environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, JBoss

greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS	JBoss
Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.	An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.
Statistics
Stacks 15.5K	Stacks 457
Followers 7.7K	Followers 255
Votes 236	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 83 Great with .net 55 I'm forced to use iis 27 Use nginx 18 Azure integration 15 Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit Cons 1 Hard to set up	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, JBoss?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

JBoss vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?

Comparison between JBoss and Microsoft IIS

Architecture: JBoss is built on the Java EE platform, which makes it more suitable for hosting Java-based applications. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS is built on the Windows Server platform, making it ideal for hosting applications developed using .NET framework.
Operating System Compatibility: JBoss is compatible with various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. It provides flexibility for developers to choose the operating system that suits their requirements. In contrast, Microsoft IIS is specifically designed for the Windows operating system and offers seamless integration with other Microsoft technologies.
Open Source vs Proprietary: JBoss is an open-source application server, which means it is freely available and allows for customization and extension of features. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS is a proprietary web server that requires a license for commercial usage, limiting the ability to modify or customize its functionalities.
Performance and Scalability: JBoss is known for its high performance and scalability, especially when it comes to handling heavy workloads and concurrent user requests. It utilizes a multi-threaded architecture and supports clustering for load balancing. Microsoft IIS also performs well but is more suitable for smaller workloads compared to JBoss.
Community and Support: JBoss has a strong and active community of developers who contribute to its development, provide support, and share knowledge through forums and communities. Microsoft IIS also has a community, but it is relatively smaller compared to JBoss. However, Microsoft offers comprehensive technical support for IIS through its customer support channels.
Integration with Development Tools and Technologies: JBoss integrates well with various Java development tools, frameworks, and technologies, making it an ideal choice for Java-based applications. Microsoft IIS, on the other hand, offers seamless integration with Microsoft development tools like Microsoft Visual Studio, ASP.NET, and other .NET-related technologies.

JBoss vs Microsoft IIS

Overview

JBoss vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?