StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs JBoss

Apache Tomcat vs JBoss

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
JBoss
JBoss
Stacks457
Followers255
Votes0

Apache Tomcat vs JBoss: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will discuss the key differences between Apache Tomcat and JBoss.

1. **Architecture**: Apache Tomcat is a lightweight, open-source application server primarily used for serving Java servlets and JSP pages. On the other hand, JBoss is a full-featured, open-source Java EE application server that provides a complete framework for developing, deploying, and running enterprise applications.

2. **Supported Technologies**: Apache Tomcat supports Servlets and JSPs, while JBoss supports a broader range of Java EE technologies such as EJB, JPA, JMS, CDI, and more. This makes JBoss suitable for complex enterprise applications that require a wide array of technologies.

3. **Clustering and High Availability**: JBoss offers built-in support for clustering and high availability, making it a better choice for applications that require scalability and fault tolerance. Apache Tomcat, while capable of clustering, might require additional configurations and third-party tools to achieve similar levels of clustering and high availability.

4. **Management and Monitoring**: JBoss comes with a comprehensive management console that allows administrators to monitor and manage various aspects of the application server. In contrast, Apache Tomcat provides basic management capabilities through its web-based administration interface, which might be sufficient for simpler deployments.

5. **Community and Support**: Apache Tomcat has a large and active community providing support, documentation, and plugins. JBoss, being a part of the Red Hat ecosystem, offers commercial support options and enterprise-grade features for businesses that require reliable and timely support.

6. **Licenses and Cost**: Apache Tomcat is distributed under the Apache License, making it free to use and suitable for open-source projects. JBoss, on the other hand, is based on the JBoss Community License and offers commercial Red Hat Enterprise support, which may incur licensing and support costs for enterprise deployments.

In Summary, Apache Tomcat is ideal for lightweight servlet and JSP-based applications, while JBoss is better suited for enterprise applications requiring a comprehensive Java EE platform with clustering and high availability features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, JBoss

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
JBoss
JBoss

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

An application platform for hosting your apps that provides an innovative modular, cloud-ready architecture, powerful management and automation, and world class developer productivity.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
457
Followers
12.6K
Followers
255
Votes
201
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, JBoss?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase