StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Jersey vs Jetty

Jersey vs Jetty

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
Jersey
Jersey
Stacks217
Followers125
Votes6

Jersey vs Jetty: What are the differences?

Jersey and Jetty are both popular frameworks used in web development. While they are often used together, they have distinct differences that set them apart. Here are the key differences between Jersey and Jetty:

  1. Container vs. Framework: Jersey is a lightweight framework that provides an API for building RESTful web services. It focuses on implementing the JAX-RS specification and does not include its own HTTP server. On the other hand, Jetty is a full-fledged HTTP server and servlet container that can run web applications built with various frameworks, including Jersey.

  2. Purpose: Jersey is specifically designed for creating RESTful web services. It provides advanced features for handling HTTP requests and responses, such as support for resource mapping, content negotiation, and response caching. Jetty, on the other hand, is a general-purpose web server and servlet container that can handle a wide range of web applications, including RESTful services.

  3. Ease of Use: Jersey is known for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a popular choice for developers getting started with building RESTful services. It provides a high-level API that abstracts away many low-level details and allows developers to focus on the core functionality of their services. Jetty, while more powerful and flexible, can be more complex to set up and configure due to its broader scope and support for various web application architectures.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Jersey is designed to be lightweight and efficient, making it suitable for small to medium-sized applications. It efficiently handles a large number of concurrent requests and provides mechanisms for scaling up the application as needed. Jetty, on the other hand, is known for its scalability and performance, making it a preferred choice for large-scale web applications that require high throughput and low latency.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: Jersey has a strong community and ecosystem built around it, with a rich set of plugins, extensions, and documentation available. It is backed by the larger Java community and has a dedicated development team. Jetty, being a more general-purpose web server, also has a thriving community and ecosystem but with a broader focus on servlet-based web applications.

  6. Deployment Options: Jersey can be deployed on any servlet container like Jetty, Tomcat, or even within an application server like GlassFish or WildFly. However, Jetty provides a standalone server that can be easily embedded within an application, allowing for more flexibility in deployment options.

In Summary, Jersey is a lightweight framework for building RESTful web services, while Jetty is a versatile web server and servlet container. Jersey focuses on simplicity and ease of use, while Jetty offers more flexibility and scalability options. Both have their strengths and are widely used in the web development community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
Jersey
Jersey

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
Track the JAX-RS API and provide regular releases of production quality Reference Implementations that ships with GlassFish; Provide APIs to extend Jersey & Build a community of users and developers; Make it easy to build RESTful Web services utilizing Java and the Java Virtual Machine.
Statistics
Stacks
510
Stacks
217
Followers
311
Followers
125
Votes
47
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Very thin
Cons
  • 0
    Student
Pros
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Fast Performance With Microservices
  • 1
    Java standard
Integrations
No integrations available
Oracle
Oracle
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Java EE
Java EE
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Jetty, Jersey?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase