StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Jetty vs Wildfly

Jetty vs Wildfly

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
Wildfly
Wildfly
Stacks187
Followers226
Votes6

Jetty vs Wildfly: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Jetty and Wildfly, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Embedded vs Application Server: Jetty is an embedded Java HTTP server and servlet container, allowing applications to be embedded within it. Wildfly, on the other hand, is a full-blown Java EE application server, providing a complete set of enterprise features.
  2. Resource Usage: Jetty is known for its lightweight nature and low resource usage, making it suitable for scenarios with limited resources. Wildfly, being a Java EE application server, requires more resources and may not be as efficient in resource-constrained environments.
  3. Configuration: Jetty's configuration is typically done using XML files or programmatically, offering flexibility and customization options. Wildfly uses a configuration system based on XML files, providing extensive configuration possibilities and management capabilities through its web-based interface.
  4. Supported Technologies: Jetty primarily focuses on servlets and Java-based web applications. Wildfly, being a Java EE application server, supports a wide range of Java EE technologies, including EJB, JMS, CDI, and more, making it well-suited for complex enterprise applications.
  5. Community and Documentation: Jetty has an active and supportive community with extensive documentation available. Wildfly, being a product of Red Hat, benefits from the large community and extensive documentation associated with JBoss, its predecessor.
  6. Development Approach: Jetty follows a rapid development cycle, delivering frequent updates and new features. Wildfly, on the other hand, follows a more conservative approach, focusing on stability and long-term support.

In summary, Jetty is an embedded server suitable for resource-constrained environments, while Wildfly is a full-fledged Java EE application server with extensive enterprise features and management capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
Wildfly
Wildfly

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

It is a flexible, lightweight, managed application runtime that helps you build amazing applications. It supports the latest standards for web development.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
-
Statistics
Stacks
510
Stacks
187
Followers
311
Followers
226
Votes
47
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Very thin
Cons
  • 0
    Student
Pros
  • 3
    Eclipse integration
  • 3
    Java
Integrations
No integrations available
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Jetty, Wildfly?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase