StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Jetty vs XAMPP

Jetty vs XAMPP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jetty
Jetty
Stacks510
Followers311
Votes47
XAMPP
XAMPP
Stacks142
Followers272
Votes6

Jetty vs XAMPP: What are the differences?

  1. Server Type: Jetty is a lightweight Java-based web server and servlet container, while XAMPP is a cross-platform web server solution stack package that includes Apache HTTP Server, MySQL database, PHP, and Perl. Jetty is more suited for small to medium-sized projects, while XAMPP is commonly used for setting up local development environments.

  2. Portability: Jetty can be easily embedded into applications due to its lightweight nature, making it more portable and suitable for integration with other software components. On the other hand, XAMPP is designed to be a standalone stack package that requires installation on a host machine.

  3. Configuration Complexity: Jetty offers more advanced configuration options and requires a deeper understanding of Java and server technologies to customize its settings. XAMPP, being a package solution, has a simpler configuration process and is more user-friendly for beginners or those looking for a quick setup.

  4. Language Support: Jetty primarily supports Java-based applications and is commonly used with servlets and JSPs. XAMPP, on the other hand, supports PHP, Perl, and MySQL in addition to Apache web server, making it a more versatile choice for web development projects that require different programming languages.

  5. Security Features: Jetty is known for its robust security features and is often used in enterprise-level applications where data protection is critical. XAMPP, while secure when properly configured, may require additional security measures depending on the specific use case and environment.

  6. Community Support: Jetty has a strong and active community of developers who contribute to its ongoing development and provide support through forums and documentation. XAMPP also has a supportive community but may have more resources available due to its widespread use and popularity in the web development community.

In Summary, Jetty and XAMPP differ in server type, portability, configuration complexity, language support, security features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jetty
Jetty
XAMPP
XAMPP

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

It consists mainly of the Apache HTTP Server, MariaDB database, and interpreters for scripts written in the PHP and Perl programming languages.

Full-featured and standards-based; Open source and commercially usable; Flexible and extensible; Small footprint; Embeddable; Asynchronous; Enterprise scalable; Dual licensed under Apache and Eclipse
-
Statistics
Stacks
510
Stacks
142
Followers
311
Followers
272
Votes
47
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Lightweight
  • 10
    Very fast
  • 10
    Embeddable
  • 6
    Scalable
  • 6
    Very thin
Cons
  • 0
    Student
Pros
  • 6
    Easy set up and installation of files

What are some alternatives to Jetty, XAMPP?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase