StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. JSF vs MapStruct

JSF vs MapStruct

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JSF
JSF
Stacks138
Followers222
Votes4
MapStruct
MapStruct
Stacks54
Followers45
Votes1
GitHub Stars7.5K
Forks1.0K

JSF vs MapStruct: What are the differences?

Developers describe JSF as "It is used for building component-based web interfaces". It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community. On the other hand, MapStruct is detailed as "A Java code generator for creating fast and type-safe bean mappings at compile time". It is a code generator that greatly simplifies the implementation of mappings between Java bean types based on a convention over configuration approach. The generated mapping code uses plain method invocations and thus is fast, type-safe and easy to understand.

JSF and MapStruct can be categorized as "Java" tools.

MapStruct is an open source tool with 2K GitHub stars and 330 GitHub forks. Here's a link to MapStruct's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JSF
JSF
MapStruct
MapStruct

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

It is a code generator that greatly simplifies the implementation of mappings between Java bean types based on a convention over configuration approach. The generated mapping code uses plain method invocations and thus is fast, type-safe and easy to understand.

-
Mapping (immutable) objects using builders; Enhanced and more flexible update method (@MappingTarget) handling; Constructor injection for Annotation Based component models; Source policy for unmapped source properties (unmappedSourcePolicy); Support for defaultExpression; Limit mapping only to explicitly defined mappings; Performance improvement of constant / defaultValue primitive to String mappings; Warnings for precision loss
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.0K
Stacks
138
Stacks
54
Followers
222
Followers
45
Votes
4
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle
  • 1
    Server Side component
  • 1
    Very Mature UI framework
Pros
  • 1
    Abstraction of the object conversion
Integrations
Java
Java
Java EE
Java EE
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
Eclipse
Eclipse
Java
Java
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to JSF, MapStruct?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase