StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. JSP vs lighttpd

JSP vs lighttpd

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

lighttpd
lighttpd
Stacks156
Followers133
Votes27
JSP
JSP
Stacks28
Followers13
Votes0

JSP vs lighttpd: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, choosing the right technology is crucial. JSP (JavaServer Pages) and lighttpd (pronounced "lighty") are two technologies commonly used for building web applications. Understanding their key differences can help developers make informed decisions.

  1. Execution Environment: JSP is a technology that enables developers to embed Java code within HTML pages, which is then compiled into servlets. On the other hand, lighttpd is a high-performance web server optimized for speed-critical environments, known for its low memory footprint and CPU efficiency.

  2. Language Support: JSP primarily supports Java for server-side logic, making it suitable for developers familiar with Java programming. In contrast, lighttpd does not support server-side scripting languages like JSP but relies on external programs or frameworks for dynamic content generation.

  3. Scalability: JSP-based applications can be scaled vertically by adding more resources to a single server, but may face limitations when scaling horizontally across multiple servers. Lighttpd, with its efficient design and event-driven architecture, excels at handling high load scenarios and can be easily scaled across multiple servers.

  4. Configuration Complexity: JSP requires a Java Servlet container like Apache Tomcat for execution, which involves configuring deployments and managing complex XML files. On the other hand, lighttpd offers a simple and straightforward configuration through its configuration file, making it easy to set up and maintain.

  5. Performance Overhead: JSP involves the overhead of compiling Java code into servlets at runtime, which can affect the performance of the application, especially in high-traffic scenarios. Lighttpd, optimized for speed and efficiency, minimizes overhead and offers better performance for delivering static and dynamic content.

  6. Community and Support: JSP benefits from a large community of Java developers and enterprises, providing extensive documentation, libraries, and support resources. Lighttpd, while not as widely adopted as JSP, has an active community and strong support for its unique features and capabilities.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between JSP and lighttpd can help developers choose the right technology based on their specific requirements, scalability needs, and performance considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

lighttpd
lighttpd
JSP
JSP

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

The official Twitter account for the sum of all knowledge, Wikipedia. Overseen by @jeffelder.

Statistics
Stacks
156
Stacks
28
Followers
133
Followers
13
Votes
27
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Proxy
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
  • 2
    Simplicity
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to lighttpd, JSP?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase