StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. KeyDB vs Redis

KeyDB vs Redis

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Redis
Redis
Stacks60.7K
Followers46.5K
Votes3.9K
GitHub Stars42
Forks6
KeyDB
KeyDB
Stacks37
Followers62
Votes5

KeyDB vs Redis: What are the differences?

KeyDB and Redis are both in-memory data stores known for their performance and scalability. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Replication Models: KeyDB and Redis use different replication models. Redis uses a single-threaded replication model where a single process handles all requests, while KeyDB uses a multi-threaded replication model where multiple threads can handle concurrent requests. This allows KeyDB to handle higher loads and distribute the workload more efficiently.

  2. Write Amplification: KeyDB provides significant improvements in write performance compared to Redis. It achieves this by reducing write amplification, which means that fewer write operations are required when updating data. This allows KeyDB to handle a higher rate of write operations with less impact on performance.

  3. Advanced Data Structures: KeyDB provides additional data structures beyond what Redis offers. While Redis supports key-value pairs, lists, sets, and hashes, KeyDB introduces new data structures like sorted sets and fixed-size lists. These additional data structures offer more flexibility in organizing and manipulating data.

  4. Optimized Storage Model: KeyDB provides an optimized storage model that reduces memory consumption compared to Redis. KeyDB employs a hashed key indexing approach and compresses data when it exceeds a certain threshold. This optimization allows for efficient memory utilization, making KeyDB suitable for applications with limited memory resources.

  5. Faster Redis Protocol Compatibility: KeyDB is designed to be fully compatible with the Redis protocol, but also offers performance enhancements. KeyDB can handle higher request rates and has minimal latency compared to Redis, making it an ideal choice for applications that require high throughput and low latency.

  6. Active-Active Replication: KeyDB introduces active-active replication, allowing data to be synchronized between multiple KeyDB instances. This provides high availability and fault tolerance, ensuring that data remains consistent across different instances. Redis, on the other hand, supports active-passive replication where one node acts as the primary and the others as backups.

In summary, KeyDB and Redis are both in-memory databases, with KeyDB being a high-performance, multithreaded fork of Redis. While Redis is a widely adopted and established solution, KeyDB differentiates itself by optimizing for multithreading, offering improved performance and scalability in scenarios with high concurrency.

Detailed Comparison

Redis
Redis
KeyDB
KeyDB

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

KeyDB is a fully open source database that aims to make use of all hardware resources. KeyDB makes it possible to breach boundaries often dictated by price and complexity.

-
Active Replication; FLASH storage support; direct backup to AWS S3; MultiMaster; Multithreaded
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
60.7K
Stacks
37
Followers
46.5K
Followers
62
Votes
3.9K
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 887
    Performance
  • 542
    Super fast
  • 514
    Ease of use
  • 444
    In-memory cache
  • 324
    Advanced key-value cache
Cons
  • 15
    Cannot query objects directly
  • 3
    No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
  • 1
    No WAL
Pros
  • 3
    Performance
  • 2
    Active Replication

What are some alternatives to Redis, KeyDB?

Hazelcast

Hazelcast

With its various distributed data structures, distributed caching capabilities, elastic nature, memcache support, integration with Spring and Hibernate and more importantly with so many happy users, Hazelcast is feature-rich, enterprise-ready and developer-friendly in-memory data grid solution.

Aerospike

Aerospike

Aerospike is an open-source, modern database built from the ground up to push the limits of flash storage, processors and networks. It was designed to operate with predictable low latency at high throughput with uncompromising reliability – both high availability and ACID guarantees.

MemSQL

MemSQL

MemSQL converges transactions and analytics for sub-second data processing and reporting. Real-time businesses can build robust applications on a simple and scalable infrastructure that complements and extends existing data pipelines.

Apache Ignite

Apache Ignite

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

SAP HANA

SAP HANA

It is an application that uses in-memory database technology that allows the processing of massive amounts of real-time data in a short time. The in-memory computing engine allows it to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk.

VoltDB

VoltDB

VoltDB is a fundamental redesign of the RDBMS that provides unparalleled performance and scalability on bare-metal, virtualized and cloud infrastructures. VoltDB is a modern in-memory architecture that supports both SQL + Java with data durability and fault tolerance.

Tarantool

Tarantool

It is designed to give you the flexibility, scalability, and performance that you want, as well as the reliability and manageability that you need in mission-critical applications

Azure Redis Cache

Azure Redis Cache

It perfectly complements Azure database services such as Cosmos DB. It provides a cost-effective solution to scale read and write throughput of your data tier. Store and share database query results, session states, static contents, and more using a common cache-aside pattern.

LokiJS

LokiJS

LokiJS is a document oriented database written in javascript, published under MIT License. Its purpose is to store javascript objects as documents in a nosql fashion and retrieve them with a similar mechanism. Runs in node (including cordova/phonegap and node-webkit), nativescript and the browser.

BuntDB

BuntDB

BuntDB is a low-level, in-memory, key/value store in pure Go. It persists to disk, is ACID compliant, and uses locking for multiple readers and a single writer. It supports custom indexes and geospatial data. It's ideal for projects that need a dependable database and favor speed over data size.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase