StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Kore vs nginx

Kore vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Kore
Kore
Stacks3
Followers11
Votes6
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks319

Kore vs nginx: What are the differences?

  1. Performance: Kore is known for its lightweight nature, designed for high-performance web applications, utilizing an event-driven architecture, whereas Nginx, while also efficient, is more feature-rich and commonly used for a wide range of web server tasks, including load balancing, reverse proxying, and caching.
  2. Configuration: Kore utilizes a simple configuration format that is easy to understand and work with, allowing for quick setups and modifications. On the other hand, Nginx uses a more complex configuration syntax, which can be daunting for beginners but provides extensive flexibility and functionality, especially for intricate server setups.
  3. Modules: Kore offers fewer out-of-the-box modules compared to Nginx, making it more streamlined and efficient for specific purposes but may require additional development for certain functionalities. Nginx, with its vast array of modules, covers a wide range of features and needs without the need for extensive customization or additional development work.
  4. Scalability: Kore is designed to be highly scalable and efficient in handling a large number of connections simultaneously, making it ideal for high-traffic web applications. Nginx, while also scalable, may require additional configurations and optimizations for extremely high loads, as it is more feature-rich and may incur additional resource overhead.
  5. Community Support: Nginx boasts a larger and more active community compared to Kore, which translates to more resources, documentation, and support available for users. Kore, while steadily growing its community, may have limited resources and community-driven contributions compared to Nginx.
  6. Ease of Use: Kore focuses on simplicity and minimalism, providing a straightforward approach to web server tasks. Nginx, although powerful, may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its extensive feature set and complex configuration options.

In Summary, Kore and Nginx differ in their performance focus, configuration simplicity, module availability, scalability, community support, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Kore

Daniel
Daniel

Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development

May 25, 2021

Decided

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

289k views289k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
Grant
Grant

Developer at GMS LLC

Sep 5, 2020

Decided
  • Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
  • The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
  • The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
  • PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
429k views429k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Kore
Kore

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Kore is an easy to use web application framework for writing scalable web APIs in C. Its main goals are security, scalability and allowing rapid development and deployment of such APIs. Because of this Kore is an ideal candidate for building robust, scalable and secure web things.

-
Supports SNI;Supports SPDY/3.1;Supports HTTP/1.1;Websocket support;Lightweight background tasks;Built-in parameter validation;Only HTTPS connections allowed;Multiple modules can be loaded at once;Built-in asynchronous PostgreSQL support;Default sane TLS ciphersuites (PFS in all major browsers);Load your web application as a precompiled dynamic library;Modules can be reloaded on-the-fly, even while serving content;Event driven (epoll/kqueue) architecture with per CPU core workers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
319
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
3
Followers
61.9K
Followers
11
Votes
5.5K
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 2
    SPDY
  • 1
    Super-lightweight
  • 1
    Full featured
  • 1
    HTTPS
  • 1
    Super-fast

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Kore?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase