StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. linkerd vs nginx

linkerd vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
linkerd
linkerd
Stacks132
Followers312
Votes7

linkerd vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between linkerd and nginx, two popular web server solutions. We will describe these differences in specific paragraphs and format them as Markdown code that can be used in a website.

  1. Implementation and Purpose: Linkerd is a service mesh for cloud-native applications that focuses on providing observability, resilience, and security to microservices architectures. It is designed to transparently handle service-to-service communication and offers features like automatic retries, circuit breaking, and load balancing. On the other hand, nginx is a high-performance web server used to serve web content, handle reverse proxying, and perform load balancing. It is often utilized as a standalone server or as a reverse proxy in front of other web servers.

  2. Protocols Supported: Linkerd operates at the application layer and can work with any application that uses HTTP or gRPC as its transport protocol. It can handle traffic in modern microservices architectures based on containers and orchestration systems like Kubernetes. In contrast, nginx supports a wide range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, HTTP/2, SMTP, POP3, and IMAP. It can also act as an SSL/TLS termination point for secure connections.

  3. Load Balancing Approach: Linkerd provides a service discovery feature that enables dynamic load balancing by automatically routing traffic to healthy instances of a service. It uses techniques like load balancing weights and fine-grained routing rules to achieve load balancing among service instances. On the other hand, nginx implements load balancing algorithms like round-robin, IP hash, and least connections to distribute traffic among backend servers. It offers more control over load balancing configurations and can be easily integrated with external load balancing services.

  4. Service Mesh Features: Linkerd offers advanced service mesh features such as traffic splitting, automatic mTLS (mutual Transport Layer Security) encryption, request-level telemetry, and service-level dashboards for monitoring application performance. These features enable fine-grained control over service-to-service communication and provide insights into the behavior of microservices. In contrast, nginx primarily focuses on serving web content and performing reverse proxying. While it does offer some advanced features like caching, rate limiting, and gzip compression, it doesn't provide the extensive service mesh capabilities offered by Linkerd.

  5. Deployment and Configuration: Linkerd is designed to be easily deployed in Kubernetes clusters and integrates well with container orchestration systems. It is deployed as a sidecar proxy alongside each service instance and requires minimal configuration for basic functionality. Nginx, on the other hand, can be deployed on any server or virtual machine and can work with various deployment scenarios. It often requires more manual configuration for setting up reverse proxying, load balancing, or other advanced features.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Linkerd has a vibrant community and active maintainers. It is part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) projects and benefits from the wider cloud-native ecosystem that includes tools like Prometheus and Grafana for monitoring. Nginx also has a large community and is widely adopted as a web server and reverse proxy. It has an extensive ecosystem of plugins and modules that provide additional functionality for tasks like caching, security, or content delivery.

In Summary, Linkerd and nginx are web server solutions with key differences. Linkerd focuses on providing service mesh capabilities for microservices architectures, while nginx primarily serves as a web server and reverse proxy. Linkerd excels in handling service-to-service communication, automatic retrying, and offering observability features, while nginx offers a wide range of protocols support, load balancing algorithms, and a larger community ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, linkerd

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
linkerd
linkerd

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

-
Adaptive load-balancing;Fine-grained instrumentation;Abstractions over service discovery;Runtime traffic routing;Tech that's built for scale
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
132
Followers
61.9K
Followers
312
Votes
5.5K
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 3
    CNCF Project
  • 1
    Pre-check permissions
  • 1
    Fast Integration
  • 1
    Light Weight
  • 1
    Service Mesh

What are some alternatives to NGINX, linkerd?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot