Lodash vs PDF.js

Overview

Lodash

Stacks10.7K

Followers886

Votes3

GitHub Stars61.3K

Forks7.1K

PDF.js

Stacks241

Followers86

Votes0

GitHub Stars52.2K

Forks10.5K

Lodash vs PDF.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Lodash and PDF.js are two widely used libraries in web development, each serving different purposes. Understanding the key differences between these two libraries is crucial in choosing the right tool for specific tasks.

Functionality: Lodash is a utility library that provides a wide range of functions to manipulate and work with arrays, objects, and other data structures in JavaScript. On the other hand, PDF.js is a library specifically designed for working with PDF files in web applications, allowing users to render, manipulate, and interact with PDF documents directly in the browser.
Use Cases: Lodash is often used for general-purpose data manipulation tasks, such as filtering, sorting, and transforming data, while PDF.js is primarily used for tasks related to displaying and working with PDF files, such as viewing, searching, and extracting text from PDF documents.
Dependencies: Lodash is a standalone library that can be easily included in a project using a simple script tag or through package managers like npm or yarn. PDF.js, on the other hand, has dependencies on other libraries such as Mozilla's PDFium and can be more challenging to integrate into a project due to its size and complexity.
Community Support: Lodash has a large and active community of developers contributing to its development and maintenance, ensuring regular updates and bug fixes. PDF.js, being developed by Mozilla, also has strong community support but may not be as actively maintained as Lodash.

In Summary, Lodash is a versatile utility library for data manipulation in JavaScript, while PDF.js is specifically tailored for working with PDF files in web applications, each serving distinct purposes in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Lodash, PDF.js

Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash	PDF.js
A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.	It is a Portable Document Format (PDF) viewer that is built with HTML5. It is community-driven and supported by Mozilla Labs. The goal is to create a general-purpose, web standards-based platform for parsing and rendering PDFs.
-	General-purpose;Platform for parsing and rendering PDFs;Built with HTML5
Statistics
GitHub Stars 61.3K	GitHub Stars 52.2K
GitHub Forks 7.1K	GitHub Forks 10.5K
Stacks 10.7K	Stacks 241
Followers 886	Followers 86
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Better than Underscore 1 Simple 0 Better that Underscore Cons 1 It reduce the performance	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	HTML5 JavaScript Firefox Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Lodash, PDF.js?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Lodash vs PDF.js: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Functionality: Lodash is a utility library that provides a wide range of functions to manipulate and work with arrays, objects, and other data structures in JavaScript. On the other hand, PDF.js is a library specifically designed for working with PDF files in web applications, allowing users to render, manipulate, and interact with PDF documents directly in the browser.
Use Cases: Lodash is often used for general-purpose data manipulation tasks, such as filtering, sorting, and transforming data, while PDF.js is primarily used for tasks related to displaying and working with PDF files, such as viewing, searching, and extracting text from PDF documents.
Dependencies: Lodash is a standalone library that can be easily included in a project using a simple script tag or through package managers like npm or yarn. PDF.js, on the other hand, has dependencies on other libraries such as Mozilla's PDFium and can be more challenging to integrate into a project due to its size and complexity.
Community Support: Lodash has a large and active community of developers contributing to its development and maintenance, ensuring regular updates and bug fixes. PDF.js, being developed by Mozilla, also has strong community support but may not be as actively maintained as Lodash.

Lodash vs PDF.js

Overview