Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Microsoft Access vs Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio: What are the differences?
Microsoft Access and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio are both popular database management tools, but there are key differences between the two that set them apart.
Data Storage and Scalability: One key difference is the way the data is stored and the scalability of the two tools. In Microsoft Access, data is stored in a single file, which makes it suitable for small and medium-sized databases. On the other hand, Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio uses a client-server architecture, allowing for larger databases and better scalability.
Performance and Speed: Another important distinction is the performance and speed of the two tools. Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio is designed for high-performance database management and can handle large amounts of data and complex queries efficiently. In contrast, Microsoft Access may experience slower performance when dealing with large datasets or complex operations.
Security and Access Control: Security and access control differ between the two tools. Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio offers robust security features, such as fine-grained access control, encryption, and audit logging. It is designed for enterprise-level data security. Microsoft Access, on the other hand, has more limited security options and may not be suitable for sensitive or highly regulated data.
Collaboration and Multi-user Support: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio is better suited for multi-user environments and supports concurrent access by multiple users. It offers features like database mirroring, replication, and clustering for high availability and supports teamwork and collaboration. Microsoft Access, on the other hand, may not handle multiple users as efficiently and is more suitable for single-user or small team environments.
SQL Language Support: Both tools support the use of SQL for querying and manipulating data, but there are differences in the SQL language support. Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio has more advanced SQL capabilities, including support for complex queries, advanced functions, and stored procedures. Microsoft Access has a more limited SQL functionality and may not support some advanced SQL features.
Integration with Other Systems: Lastly, integration with other systems is a crucial distinction. Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio integrates well with other Microsoft tools and technologies, such as Visual Studio and Microsoft Azure. It offers seamless data integration and interoperability. Microsoft Access, while it can integrate with other Microsoft Office applications, may not have the same level of integration capabilities as Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio.
In summary, Microsoft Access and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio have key differences in terms of data storage, scalability, performance, security, collaboration, SQL language support, and integration with other systems. Choose the tool that best suits your specific database management needs and requirements.
I am looking to build an azure database that connects to my power bi application. Initially, I attempted to create an Azure SQL database, then realized I needed to have SQL Server Management Service in order to manage and connect between Azure SQL <=> Power BI, but since I am on a Mac, I had to use the complex installation as a workaround.
If MySQL Workbench can solve this (as the product is available on Mac), I am more than happy to proceed with this approach if it can achieve the same goal of connecting an azure database with my Power BI application
What I am trying to achieve is fairly simple: have an online cloud database that connects to my Power BI application
I am open to any other solutions as well
Thank you
As others have noted, MySQL Workbench cannot be used instead of Microsoft SQL Manager to manage Azure SQL (MS-SQL Server, I hate that Microsoft uses generic category names for their products).
If you're considering switching to MySQL (Possibly using Azure MySQL managed database), then please not that unlike MS-SQL Server, you do not need the MySQL Workbench to connect your application to MysQL: just use the correct driver for your stack, and you're all set (if your stack is using the .Net platform, use MySQL Connector/NET from: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ ).
If you do want to use a graphical interface to maintain your MySQL database, then MySQL Workbench is a great choice, but you are not limited to it - as others have mentioned, there is a plethora of competing graphical database management tools that would work just as well with MySQL - one of the advantages of choosing MySQL for your stack is the huge eco-system that is built around it.
Hello Could you give us a better idea of what Data Base Management System (DBMS) you are using at Azure? MySQL Workbench and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) are tools developed to exclusively manage MySQL and SQL Server, respectively. If you need to manage multiple DBMS's from a single tool, I sugget you try DBeaver. There are also another alternatives: HeidiSQL, phpMyAdmin, etc. Regarding the DBMS itself, I suggest you stick with SQL Server. In my opinion it's more stable and has more features than MySQL - especially in the Standard and Enterprise editions. Regards, Lawrence
As far as I know, MySQL Workbench doesn't handle Microsoft connections, including Azure, you should try Microsoft solutions such as MS VS Code.
Microsoft provides an application known as Azure Data Studio that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux machines. It provides the ability to manage an Azure SQL database, as well as connecting to standard SQL Server databases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/azure-data-studio/what-is?view=sql-server-ver15
Hi Aashwiin, Looking at your stack (https://stackshare.io/aashwiin82347/my-stack), it seems you are using Azure SQL Databases. I'll infer this is Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, it certainly makes sense you stick with some of the official Microsoft Tooling to connect to it, query and administer it. You'd only be looking at MySQL Query Workbench, if you were running and connecting to a MySQL Database. - That said, could Azure MySQL (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/mysql/overview) be an option for you a this point? MySQL offers great performance. I have been running it at various companies (under AWS/RDS and AWS/Aurora) and have no reason to switch over to anything else. - Decision making-wise, how much do your want your local sql/mysql client to influence/weigh in your architecture/technology decisions, though? This can be a slippery slope. - Alternatively, other clients exist, such as "Table Plus" and allow you to connect, on Mac, to a variety of database servers, including SQL Server. It might be worth giving it a try.
