Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Tomcat vs Microsoft Azure vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?
Introduction
Apache Tomcat, Microsoft Azure, and Microsoft IIS are all web server technologies that provide platforms for hosting websites. Each of these technologies has its own unique features and advantages. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Apache Tomcat and Microsoft Azure, as well as Microsoft IIS.
Scalability: One key difference between Apache Tomcat and Microsoft Azure and Microsoft IIS is their scalability. Apache Tomcat is designed to be lightweight and is better suited for hosting smaller applications or websites. On the other hand, Microsoft Azure and Microsoft IIS are more scalable and can handle larger workloads and applications with high traffic demands.
Platform compatibility: Another difference lies in their platform compatibility. Apache Tomcat is primarily designed to run on a Java platform and is best suited for Java-based applications. Microsoft Azure, on the other hand, supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, including Java, .NET, and Node.js. Microsoft IIS primarily supports .NET applications and is tightly integrated with the Windows operating system.
Deployment models: The deployment models also differ between Apache Tomcat and Microsoft Azure/Microsoft IIS. Apache Tomcat is typically deployed on-premises or on a dedicated server, requiring manual configuration and management. In contrast, both Microsoft Azure and Microsoft IIS offer cloud-based deployment models, providing greater scalability, automated management, and easy integration with other cloud services.
Cost and pricing: Cost is another important consideration when comparing these technologies. Apache Tomcat is open-source and free to use, which can be a cost advantage for smaller applications. Microsoft Azure offers a range of pricing options, including pay-as-you-go, allowing flexibility based on usage and resource requirements. Microsoft IIS is included as part of Windows Server licenses, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations already using Windows infrastructure.
Ecosystem and integrations: Another difference lies in the ecosystem and integrations available for each technology. Apache Tomcat has a strong Java ecosystem and integrates well with Java frameworks and tools. Microsoft Azure, being a cloud platform, offers a wide range of integrations with other Microsoft services and tools, such as Azure Active Directory and Azure DevOps. Microsoft IIS integrates closely with the Windows Server ecosystem and provides seamless integration with other Microsoft technologies.
Flexibility and customization: Lastly, flexibility and customization options differ among these technologies. Apache Tomcat offers greater flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to fine-tune the server configuration and optimize for specific requirements. Microsoft Azure and Microsoft IIS provide a more standardized and controlled environment, with less flexibility for customization but offering easier management and deployment options.
In summary, Apache Tomcat is a lightweight web server ideal for Java-based applications, while Microsoft Azure and Microsoft IIS offer greater scalability, platform compatibility, and cloud-based deployment options. Cost, ecosystem and integrations, and customization also vary among these technologies. Choose the one that aligns best with your application requirements, scalability needs, and existing infrastructure.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.
I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.
Pros of Microsoft Azure
- Scales well and quite easy114
- Can use .Net or open source tools96
- Startup friendly81
- Startup plans via BizSpark73
- High performance62
- Wide choice of services38
- Low cost32
- Lots of integrations32
- Reliability31
- Twillio & Github are directly accessible19
- RESTful API13
- PaaS10
- Enterprise Grade10
- Startup support10
- DocumentDB8
- In person support7
- Free for students6
- Service Bus6
- Virtual Machines6
- Redis Cache5
- It rocks5
- Storage, Backup, and Recovery4
- Infrastructure Services4
- SQL Databases4
- CDN4
- Integration3
- Scheduler3
- Preview Portal3
- HDInsight3
- Built on Node.js3
- Big Data3
- BizSpark 60k Azure Benefit3
- IaaS3
- Backup2
- Open cloud2
- Web2
- SaaS2
- Big Compute2
- Mobile2
- Media2
- Dev-Test2
- Storage2
- StorSimple2
- Machine Learning2
- Stream Analytics2
- Data Factory2
- Event Hubs2
- Virtual Network2
- ExpressRoute2
- Traffic Manager2
- Media Services2
- BizTalk Services2
- Site Recovery2
- Active Directory2
- Multi-Factor Authentication2
- Visual Studio Online2
- Application Insights2
- Automation2
- Operational Insights2
- Key Vault2
- Infrastructure near your customers2
- Easy Deployment2
- Enterprise customer preferences1
- Documentation1
- Security1
- Best cloud platfrom1
- Easy and fast to start with1
- Remote Debugging1
Pros of Microsoft IIS
- Great with .net83
- I'm forced to use iis55
- Use nginx27
- Azure integration18
- Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit15
- Fast10
- Reliable6
- Performance6
- Powerful4
- Simple to configure3
- Webserver3
- Easy setup2
- Shipped with Windows Server1
- Ssl integration1
- Security1
- Охуенный1
Pros of Apache Tomcat
- Easy79
- Java72
- Popular49
- Spring web1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Microsoft Azure
- Confusing UI7
- Expensive plesk on Azure2
Cons of Microsoft IIS
- Hard to set up1
Cons of Apache Tomcat
- Blocking - each http request block a thread3
- Easy to set up2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Microsoft Azure?
What is Microsoft IIS?
What is Apache Tomcat?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Microsoft Azure?
What companies use Microsoft IIS?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Microsoft IIS?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
Rafay Systems