StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Microsoft IIS vs OpenResty

Microsoft IIS vs OpenResty

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
OpenResty
OpenResty
Stacks2.3K
Followers227
Votes0

Microsoft IIS vs OpenResty: What are the differences?

Introduction

Microsoft IIS and OpenResty are web servers that serve different purposes in the realm of web hosting and server management. Each of these servers has its own unique features and capabilities that cater to specific needs. Below are the key differences between Microsoft IIS and OpenResty.

  1. Operating System Compatibility: Microsoft IIS primarily runs on Windows operating systems, making it the preferred choice for organizations that heavily rely on Windows platforms. On the other hand, OpenResty is based on NGINX and is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and Unix. This makes OpenResty a versatile option for users who require cross-platform support.

  2. Request Handling: In terms of request handling, Microsoft IIS provides support for multiple programming languages such as ASP.NET, PHP, and Python, making it a suitable choice for developers with diverse language preferences. OpenResty, on the other hand, has a focus on Lua programming language, offering efficient request handling and processing through Lua scripts. This makes OpenResty more streamlined and specialized in request handling compared to Microsoft IIS.

  3. Extension Ecosystem: Microsoft IIS has a rich ecosystem of extensions and plugins available through the Microsoft Web Platform Installer, allowing users to enhance and customize their server functionality easily. OpenResty, on the other hand, leverages NGINX's vast library of third-party modules and Lua-based extensions, providing users with a wide range of extension options for advanced server configurations. This gives OpenResty an edge in flexibility and customization compared to Microsoft IIS.

  4. Scalability and Performance: When it comes to scalability and performance, OpenResty is known for its high-concurrency handling capabilities and lightweight nature, making it well-suited for high-traffic websites and applications. Microsoft IIS, while capable of handling heavy workloads, may require additional resources and configurations to achieve comparable performance levels to OpenResty in certain scenarios. OpenResty's architecture and design cater more towards optimized performance and scalability.

  5. Community and Support: Microsoft IIS benefits from strong support from Microsoft and a large user community, ensuring regular updates, patches, and a wealth of online resources for troubleshooting and assistance. OpenResty, being an open-source software, relies on its community of developers and users for support and enhancements. While OpenResty has an active community, the level of support may vary compared to the robust backing of Microsoft for IIS.

  6. Cost Considerations: Microsoft IIS is included as part of Windows Server licensing, making it a cost-effective option for organizations already using Windows Server setups. In contrast, OpenResty is open-source software, meaning it is free to use and does not incur licensing costs. This makes OpenResty a budget-friendly choice for users seeking a powerful web server solution without the added expense of licensing fees.

In Summary, Microsoft IIS and OpenResty differ in terms of operating system compatibility, request handling capabilities, extension ecosystem, scalability and performance, community support, and cost considerations, each offering unique advantages based on specific user requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, OpenResty

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
OpenResty
OpenResty

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

OpenResty (aka. ngx_openresty) is a full-fledged web application server by bundling the standard Nginx core, lots of 3rd-party Nginx modules, as well as most of their external dependencies.

Statistics
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
7.7K
Followers
227
Votes
236
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
NGINX
NGINX

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, OpenResty?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase