StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Dedicated Cloud Hosting
  5. Microsoft IIS vs OVH

Microsoft IIS vs OVH

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OVH
OVH
Stacks350
Followers292
Votes183
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236

Microsoft IIS vs OVH: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When choosing between Microsoft IIS (Internet Information Services) and OVH for web hosting services, it is essential to consider the key differences between the two platforms to make an informed decision.

  1. Operating System Compatibility: One of the primary differences between Microsoft IIS and OVH is the operating system compatibility. Microsoft IIS is designed to work seamlessly with Windows operating systems, offering better integration and performance optimization. On the other hand, OVH supports a wider range of operating systems, including Linux and Windows, providing more flexibility in choosing the ideal environment for hosting your websites.

  2. Control Panel Features: Another significant difference between Microsoft IIS and OVH lies in the control panel features. Microsoft IIS typically relies on Windows-based control panels such as Plesk or custom-built solutions, offering a user-friendly interface with robust management tools. In contrast, OVH provides its own control panel called OVH Manager, which might offer a different set of features and functionalities compared to Windows-based control panels.

  3. Scalability and Pricing: Microsoft IIS tends to be more expensive in terms of licensing fees and maintenance costs, especially for large-scale deployments requiring advanced features and support. On the other hand, OVH offers more flexible pricing plans and scalability options, making it a more cost-effective solution for businesses of all sizes looking to expand their online presence without breaking the bank.

  4. Technical Support and Reliability: Microsoft IIS is backed by Microsoft's extensive technical support network, ensuring reliable assistance and troubleshooting for any issues that may arise. In comparison, OVH's support may vary depending on the service plan chosen, with potentially limited resources for resolving complex technical problems quickly.

  5. Security Measures: When it comes to security, Microsoft IIS often integrates tightly with other Microsoft security tools and services, providing a comprehensive approach to safeguarding your websites and data. Meanwhile, OVH offers its own security measures and protocols to protect against threats, but the level of integration and customization might differ from Microsoft's offerings.

  6. Customization and Configuration Options: Microsoft IIS offers a high degree of customization and configuration options, allowing users to fine-tune settings to meet their specific requirements and performance goals. In comparison, OVH may have limitations regarding customizability, depending on the hosting plans and services chosen, potentially affecting the ability to optimize the environment for maximum performance.

In Summary, the key differences between Microsoft IIS and OVH lie in operating system compatibility, control panel features, scalability and pricing, technical support and reliability, security measures, as well as customization and configuration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on OVH, Microsoft IIS

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

OVH
OVH
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS

OVHcloud is a global cloud provider that specialises in delivering industry-leading performance and cost-effective solutions to better manage, secure, and scale data. The group manages 30 data centres across 12 sites in 4 continents, man

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Delivery of servers in less than an hour 24/7/365;Full user control;Guaranteed bandwidth;99,99 % availability;Leader in the use of SSD;Latest technology components;More than 85 operating systems and distributions
-
Statistics
Stacks
350
Stacks
15.5K
Followers
292
Followers
7.7K
Votes
183
Votes
236
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 57
    Cost effective
  • 34
    Dedicated Hardware
  • 29
    DDoS Protection
  • 27
    Unmetered Bandwidth
  • 9
    Fun
Cons
  • 2
    Incidents
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up

What are some alternatives to OVH, Microsoft IIS?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

SoftLayer

SoftLayer

SoftLayer dedicated servers give you options from entry-level single processor servers to quad proc, hex-core, and even GPU-powered workhorses. They're all deployed in real time via our portal or API.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Hetzner Online AG

Hetzner Online AG

Hetzner Online is a professional web hosting provider and experienced data center operator. Since 1997 the company has provided private and business clients with high-performance hosting products as well as the necessary infrastructure for the efficient operation of websites.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase