Microsoft IIS vs Uvicorn

Overview

Microsoft IIS

Stacks15.5K

Followers7.7K

Votes236

Uvicorn

Stacks168

Followers119

Votes0

Microsoft IIS vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Microsoft IIS and Uvicorn.

Scalability: Microsoft IIS is built for Windows-based environments and is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. It is well-suited for enterprise-level applications that require high scalability and high-performance. On the other hand, Uvicorn is a lightweight ASGI server that is designed to be highly scalable and efficient. It is particularly suited for applications with high concurrency, such as websockets or long-polling.
Platform Compatibility: Microsoft IIS is specifically designed for the Windows operating system and does not support other platforms. It takes advantage of the features and functionalities provided by Windows to deliver optimal performance. In contrast, Uvicorn is a cross-platform server that can run on various operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS. This platform compatibility allows developers to work on their preferred environment without restrictions.
Protocol Support: Microsoft IIS primarily supports the HTTP and HTTPS protocols, making it suitable for traditional web applications. It provides advanced features like SSL/TLS encryption, load balancing, and support for various authentication mechanisms. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is built on ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) and supports multiple protocols like HTTP, WebSocket, and HTTP/2. This allows developers to build real-time applications and take advantage of the superior performance provided by ASGI.
Deployment Flexibility: Microsoft IIS is typically used as a standalone web server and requires a Windows server environment for deployment. It integrates tightly with other Microsoft technologies like .NET framework and can run a wide range of application types, including ASP.NET, PHP, and Node.js. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is often used in conjunction with other technologies like Django, Flask, or FastAPI. It can be deployed with various hosting options, including Docker containers, cloud platforms, and traditional web servers.
Configuration and Management: Microsoft IIS provides a rich graphical user interface (GUI) for easy configuration and management. It offers a wide range of options to customize server settings, manage application pools, and set up security features. Uvicorn, being a lightweight server, does not provide a GUI but can be configured using command-line arguments or configuration files. It is designed to be simple and easy to use, with minimal overhead.
Performance and Efficiency: Microsoft IIS is a robust and mature server that offers high performance and stability. It has been optimized for Windows-based environments and provides advanced features like caching, compression, and integrated request processing. Uvicorn, being designed for high-performance applications, achieves excellent efficiency by utilizing asynchronous processing techniques. It leverages the capabilities of modern Python frameworks and libraries to deliver fast and efficient server performance.

In summary, Microsoft IIS is a powerful web server specifically designed for Windows environments, providing excellent scalability and performance for enterprise-level applications. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is a lightweight and cross-platform ASGI server that excels in high-concurrency applications and offers flexibility in deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, Uvicorn

greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS	Uvicorn
Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.	It is a lightning-fast ASGI server, built on uvloop and httptools. Until recently Python has lacked a minimal low-level server/application interface for asyncio frameworks. The ASGI specification fills this gap, and means we're now able to start building a common set of tooling usable across all asyncio frameworks.
-	ASGI server implementation; Supports HTTP/1.1 and WebSockets; Support for HTTP/2 is planned
Statistics
Stacks 15.5K	Stacks 168
Followers 7.7K	Followers 119
Votes 236	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 83 Great with .net 55 I'm forced to use iis 27 Use nginx 18 Azure integration 15 Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit Cons 1 Hard to set up	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Python

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, Uvicorn?

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Microsoft IIS vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Microsoft IIS and Uvicorn.

Scalability: Microsoft IIS is built for Windows-based environments and is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. It is well-suited for enterprise-level applications that require high scalability and high-performance. On the other hand, Uvicorn is a lightweight ASGI server that is designed to be highly scalable and efficient. It is particularly suited for applications with high concurrency, such as websockets or long-polling.
Platform Compatibility: Microsoft IIS is specifically designed for the Windows operating system and does not support other platforms. It takes advantage of the features and functionalities provided by Windows to deliver optimal performance. In contrast, Uvicorn is a cross-platform server that can run on various operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS. This platform compatibility allows developers to work on their preferred environment without restrictions.
Protocol Support: Microsoft IIS primarily supports the HTTP and HTTPS protocols, making it suitable for traditional web applications. It provides advanced features like SSL/TLS encryption, load balancing, and support for various authentication mechanisms. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is built on ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) and supports multiple protocols like HTTP, WebSocket, and HTTP/2. This allows developers to build real-time applications and take advantage of the superior performance provided by ASGI.
Deployment Flexibility: Microsoft IIS is typically used as a standalone web server and requires a Windows server environment for deployment. It integrates tightly with other Microsoft technologies like .NET framework and can run a wide range of application types, including ASP.NET, PHP, and Node.js. Uvicorn, on the other hand, is often used in conjunction with other technologies like Django, Flask, or FastAPI. It can be deployed with various hosting options, including Docker containers, cloud platforms, and traditional web servers.
Configuration and Management: Microsoft IIS provides a rich graphical user interface (GUI) for easy configuration and management. It offers a wide range of options to customize server settings, manage application pools, and set up security features. Uvicorn, being a lightweight server, does not provide a GUI but can be configured using command-line arguments or configuration files. It is designed to be simple and easy to use, with minimal overhead.
Performance and Efficiency: Microsoft IIS is a robust and mature server that offers high performance and stability. It has been optimized for Windows-based environments and provides advanced features like caching, compression, and integrated request processing. Uvicorn, being designed for high-performance applications, achieves excellent efficiency by utilizing asynchronous processing techniques. It leverages the capabilities of modern Python frameworks and libraries to deliver fast and efficient server performance.

Microsoft IIS vs Uvicorn

Overview

Microsoft IIS vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?