StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Microsoft IIS vs Wildfly

Microsoft IIS vs Wildfly

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
Wildfly
Wildfly
Stacks187
Followers226
Votes6

Microsoft IIS vs Wildfly: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Microsoft IIS and Wildfly. Both Microsoft IIS (Internet Information Services) and Wildfly are popular web server options used for hosting websites and applications. However, they have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart from each other.

  1. Architecture: Microsoft IIS operates on the Windows operating system and is tightly integrated with other Microsoft products. It uses a modular architecture and supports the ASP.NET framework for developing web applications. On the other hand, Wildfly is based on the Java EE (Enterprise Edition) platform and can run on various operating systems. It supports a wide range of Java-based frameworks like JSP, JSF, and JPA.

  2. Scalability and Performance: In terms of scalability, Wildfly offers better scalability options. It supports clustering and load balancing, allowing for the distribution of workload across multiple servers. Microsoft IIS also supports scalability, but it requires additional configuration and tools for load balancing. When it comes to performance, both servers have optimal performance, but Wildfly's Java-based runtime environment can provide better performance for Java-based applications.

  3. Management and Configuration: Microsoft IIS provides a user-friendly graphical interface known as the Internet Information Services (IIS) Manager for managing and configuring the server settings. It also offers a rich set of features and tools for managing websites and applications. In contrast, Wildfly is primarily managed through command-line tools or script-based configurations. It requires a deeper understanding of the server's configuration files and command-line interface for effective management.

  4. Platform Support: Microsoft IIS is limited to Windows-based operating systems, including Windows Server and Windows desktop editions. It is tightly integrated with the Windows ecosystem, allowing seamless integration with other Microsoft products. Wildfly, on the other hand, can run on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. It offers more flexibility for developers and administrators when choosing the operating system for hosting their applications.

  5. Community and Support: Microsoft IIS benefits from having strong community support and a large user base due to its association with Microsoft. It has extensive documentation, forums, and online resources to assist users in troubleshooting issues and finding solutions. Wildfly also has an active community, but its user base is relatively smaller compared to Microsoft IIS. However, Wildfly benefits from the vast Java community, which provides support and resources for Java-based applications.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Microsoft IIS is a commercial product that comes bundled with Windows Server editions. The licensing cost for Microsoft IIS is typically included in the overall licensing cost of the Windows Server operating system. On the other hand, Wildfly is an open-source server and is available for free under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). This makes Wildfly a cost-effective option for organizations that prefer open-source solutions.

In summary, Microsoft IIS and Wildfly differ in terms of architecture, scalability, management, platform support, community, and licensing. Microsoft IIS has a closer integration with the Windows ecosystem and offers a user-friendly interface, while Wildfly provides better scalability options and broader platform support. Microsoft IIS is a commercial product, whereas Wildfly is an open-source server.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, Wildfly

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Wildfly
Wildfly

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

It is a flexible, lightweight, managed application runtime that helps you build amazing applications. It supports the latest standards for web development.

Statistics
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
187
Followers
7.7K
Followers
226
Votes
236
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 3
    Eclipse integration
  • 3
    Java
Integrations
No integrations available
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, Wildfly?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase