StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Undertow vs nginx

Undertow vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Undertow
Undertow
Stacks49
Followers94
Votes5

Undertow vs nginx: What are the differences?

  1. The Architecture: Undertow is a lightweight web server that is built around a non-blocking I/O model, allowing it to efficiently handle thousands of concurrent connections with very low resource consumption. On the other hand, Nginx is also designed to handle a large number of simultaneous connections, but it uses an event-driven architecture that relies on asynchronous and event-driven processing, allowing it to efficiently serve static files and act as a reverse proxy for load balancing and caching.
  2. Configuration and Extensibility: Undertow uses a configuration file in XML format to define its settings and deployments, making it customizable and easy to manage. Nginx, on the other hand, uses a simple and readable configuration file written in its own scripting language that provides flexibility and extensibility to customize its behavior and integrate with other systems.
  3. SSL/TLS Support: Both Undertow and Nginx provide support for SSL/TLS encryption protocols to secure web communications. However, Nginx has built-in capabilities to handle SSL/TLS termination and certificate management, making it more suitable for handling HTTPS traffic without the need for additional components or configurations.
  4. HTTP/2 Support: Nginx has better native support for the HTTP/2 protocol, which brings significant performance improvements over the older HTTP/1.1 protocol. By contrast, Undertow requires additional configuration and modules to support HTTP/2, which may require more effort and expertise to set up and optimize.
  5. Embedded Mode: Undertow can be embedded within Java applications, allowing developers to create lightweight and self-contained web servers as part of their application deployments. On the other hand, Nginx is typically used as a standalone web server or a reverse proxy and does not have built-in capabilities for embedding within applications.
  6. Operating System Support: Nginx is a cross-platform web server that can run on a wide range of operating systems, including Windows, Linux, macOS, and various Unix flavors. Meanwhile, Undertow is primarily tailored for Java applications and is supported on Java Virtual Machines (JVMs) running on different platforms.

In summary, Undertow is a lightweight Java-based web server that excels in terms of performance and resource efficiency, while Nginx offers a versatile and highly customizable solution with better support for SSL/TLS, HTTP/2, and operating system diversity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Undertow

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Undertow
Undertow

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

It is a flexible performant web server written in java, providing both blocking and non-blocking API’s based on NIO. It has a composition based architecture that allows you to build a web server by combining small single purpose handlers. The gives you the flexibility to choose between a full Java EE servlet 4.0 container, or a low level non-blocking handler, to anything in between.

-
Flexible Web Server; composition based architecture
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
49
Followers
61.9K
Followers
94
Votes
5.5K
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 4
    Performance
  • 1
    Lower footprint
Cons
  • 1
    Smaller community
  • 1
    Less known
Integrations
No integrations available
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Wildfly
Wildfly

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Undertow?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase