NGINX vs Uvicorn

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

NGINX

112K
59.9K
+ 1
5.5K
Uvicorn

79
117
+ 1
0
Add tool

Uvicorn vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

This document compares the key differences between Uvicorn and nginx in terms of their functionalities and use cases.

  1. Handling of HTTP and WebSocket protocols: Uvicorn is an ASGI (Asynchronous Server Gateway Interface) server, which means it supports both HTTP and WebSocket protocols. It can handle bi-directional communication over WebSocket connections, making it suitable for real-time applications that require continuous data exchange between the server and clients. On the other hand, nginx is primarily designed as a high-performance HTTP server and reverse proxy. While it can handle WebSocket connections, it has limited support and is less optimized for real-time communication.

  2. Performance and scalability: Uvicorn is built on top of the high-performance ASGI framework, enabling it to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. It utilizes asynchronous programming to achieve high scalability and can process multiple requests concurrently without blocking, resulting in better overall performance. In contrast, nginx is known for its exceptional performance as an HTTP server and reverse proxy. It is specifically optimized for handling large volumes of HTTP traffic and can efficiently distribute requests across multiple backend servers, making it excellent for high-traffic websites and load balancing.

  3. Web server vs. reverse proxy: Uvicorn is primarily a web server, responsible for handling incoming client requests and serving responses. It can be used directly to deploy Python web applications and APIs. On the other hand, nginx functions as a reverse proxy and load balancer, sitting between client requests and backend servers. It is often used in combination with other web servers, including Uvicorn, to improve performance, handle SSL termination, caching, and routing.

  4. Configuration and customization: Uvicorn is highly customizable and allows developers to fine-tune various settings for their applications. It provides options to configure the number of worker processes, maximum connections, timeouts, and more. Nginx also offers extensive configuration options, allowing users to control various aspects of its behavior, such as caching, load balancing algorithms, SSL certificates, and request routing. Additionally, nginx has a modular architecture that enables the addition of various third-party modules to enhance its functionality.

  5. Operating system support: Uvicorn is a Python-based server and can run on any operating system that supports Python. It is well-suited for development scenarios and can be easily deployed on platforms like Linux, macOS, and Windows. Nginx, on the other hand, is a cross-platform solution and can run on a wide range of operating systems, including Linux, macOS, Windows, and BSD variants. It is widely used in production environments and offers robust support for various operating systems.

  6. Logging and monitoring: Uvicorn provides default logging capabilities, allowing developers to log information and debug their applications. It also integrates well with popular Python logging libraries for advanced logging needs. Nginx includes comprehensive logging features, enabling access logging, error logging, and the ability to customize log formats. Additionally, nginx offers various mechanisms for monitoring server performance and traffic, including built-in metrics and integration with third-party monitoring tools.

In summary, Uvicorn is an ASGI web server optimized for handling HTTP and WebSocket protocols, providing high performance, scalability, and configurability. Nginx, on the other hand, is a powerful HTTP server and reverse proxy that excels in handling high volumes of HTTP traffic, load balancing, and extensive configuration options. Both have their strengths and are often used together in deployment scenarios leveraging the strengths of each.

Advice on NGINX and Uvicorn

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!

See more
Replies (1)
Simon Aronsson
Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact · | 4 upvotes · 635.5K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.

See more
Needs advice
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
and
NGINXNGINX

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

See more
Leandro Barral
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure

See more
Christian Cwienk
Software Developer at SAP · | 1 upvotes · 604.7K views
Recommends
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server

I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of NGINX
Pros of Uvicorn
  • 1.4K
    High-performance http server
  • 893
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 288
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 225
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of NGINX
    Cons of Uvicorn
    • 10
      Advanced features require subscription
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is NGINX?

      nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

      What is Uvicorn?

      It is a lightning-fast ASGI server, built on uvloop and httptools. Until recently Python has lacked a minimal low-level server/application interface for asyncio frameworks. The ASGI specification fills this gap, and means we're now able to start building a common set of tooling usable across all asyncio frameworks.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention NGINX and Uvicorn as a desired skillset
      What companies use NGINX?
      What companies use Uvicorn?
      See which teams inside your own company are using NGINX or Uvicorn.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with NGINX?
      What tools integrate with Uvicorn?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to NGINX and Uvicorn?
      HAProxy
      HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
      lighttpd
      lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.
      Traefik
      A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.
      Caddy
      Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.
      Envoy
      Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
      See all alternatives