nginx vs Websphere

Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

nginx
nginx

55.1K
13.4K
+ 1
5.4K
Websphere
Websphere

31
12
+ 1
0
Add tool

nginx vs Websphere: What are the differences?

What is nginx? A high performance free open source web server powering busiest sites on the Internet. nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

What is Websphere? Application and integration middleware. It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.

nginx and Websphere belong to "Web Servers" category of the tech stack.

nginx is an open source tool with 9.31K GitHub stars and 3.5K GitHub forks. Here's a link to nginx's open source repository on GitHub.

Airbnb, Uber Technologies, and Spotify are some of the popular companies that use nginx, whereas Websphere is used by Sainsburys, Maps S.A., and Turbonomic. nginx has a broader approval, being mentioned in 10607 company stacks & 12948 developers stacks; compared to Websphere, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 11 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is nginx?

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

What is Websphere?

It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose nginx?
Why do developers choose Websphere?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use nginx?
        What companies use Websphere?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with nginx?
        What tools integrate with Websphere?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        What are some alternatives to nginx and Websphere?
        HAProxy
        HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
        lighttpd
        lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.
        Traefik
        A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.
        Caddy
        Caddy is a production-ready open-source web server that is fast, easy to use, and makes you more productive. HTTP/2 and HTTPS by default
        Envoy
        Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about nginx and Websphere
        Tim Abbott
        Tim Abbott
        Founder at Zulip · | 5 upvotes · 39.5K views
        atZulipZulip
        Apache HTTP Server
        Apache HTTP Server
        nginx
        nginx

        We've been happy with nginx as part of our stack. As an open source web application that folks install on-premise, the configuration system for the webserver is pretty important to us. I have a few complaints (e.g. the configuration syntax for conditionals is a pain), but overall we've found it pretty easy to build a configurable set of options (see link) for how to run Zulip on nginx, both directly and with a remote reverse proxy in front of it, with a minimum of code duplication.

        Certainly I've been a lot happier with it than I was working with Apache HTTP Server in past projects.

        See more
        Go
        Go
        Lua
        Lua
        OpenResty
        OpenResty
        nginx
        nginx
        Logstash
        Logstash
        Prometheus
        Prometheus

        At Kong while building an internal tool, we struggled to route metrics to Prometheus and logs to Logstash without incurring too much latency in our metrics collection.

        We replaced nginx with OpenResty on the edge of our tool which allowed us to use the lua-nginx-module to run Lua code that captures metrics and records telemetry data during every request’s log phase. Our code then pushes the metrics to a local aggregator process (written in Go) which in turn exposes them in Prometheus Exposition Format for consumption by Prometheus. This solution reduced the number of components we needed to maintain and is fast thanks to NGINX and LuaJIT.

        See more
        Scott Mebberson
        Scott Mebberson
        CTO / Chief Architect at Idearium · | 5 upvotes · 23.2K views
        Caddy
        Caddy
        nginx
        nginx

        We used to primarily use nginx for our static web server and proxy in-front of Node.js. Now, we use Caddy. And we couldn't be happier.

        Caddy is simpler on all fronts. Configuration is easier. Free HTTPS out of the box. Some fantastic plugins. And for the most part, it's fast.

        Don't get me wrong, it's not lost on me that Nginx is actually a superior product.

        But for the times when you don't need that extra performance, and complexity - take a look at Caddy.

        See more
        Simon Bettison
        Simon Bettison
        Managing Director at Bettison.org Limited · | 6 upvotes · 91.4K views
        atBettison.org LimitedBettison.org Limited
        Amazon EC2 Container Service
        Amazon EC2 Container Service
        Docker
        Docker
        Amazon VPC
        Amazon VPC
        Amazon Route 53
        Amazon Route 53
        Amazon SQS
        Amazon SQS
        Amazon SES
        Amazon SES
        Amazon CloudFront
        Amazon CloudFront
        nginx
        nginx
        Unicorn
        Unicorn
        Ruby
        Ruby
        Travis CI
        Travis CI
        Selenium
        Selenium
        RSpec
        RSpec
        Rails
        Rails
        Amazon ElastiCache
        Amazon ElastiCache
        Redis
        Redis
        Sidekiq
        Sidekiq
        Elasticsearch
        Elasticsearch
        PostgreSQL
        PostgreSQL

        In 2010 we made the very difficult decision to entirely re-engineer our existing monolithic LAMP application from the ground up in order to address some growing concerns about it's long term viability as a platform.

        Full application re-write is almost always never the answer, because of the risks involved. However the situation warranted drastic action as it was clear that the existing product was going to face severe scaling issues. We felt it better address these sooner rather than later and also take the opportunity to improve the international architecture and also to refactor the database in. order that it better matched the changes in core functionality.

        PostgreSQL was chosen for its reputation as being solid ACID compliant database backend, it was available as an offering AWS RDS service which reduced the management overhead of us having to configure it ourselves. In order to reduce read load on the primary database we implemented an Elasticsearch layer for fast and scalable search operations. Synchronisation of these indexes was to be achieved through the use of Sidekiq's Redis based background workers on Amazon ElastiCache. Again the AWS solution here looked to be an easy way to keep our involvement in managing this part of the platform at a minimum. Allowing us to focus on our core business.

        Rails ls was chosen for its ability to quickly get core functionality up and running, its MVC architecture and also its focus on Test Driven Development using RSpec and Selenium with Travis CI providing continual integration. We also liked Ruby for its terse, clean and elegant syntax. Though YMMV on that one!

        Unicorn was chosen for its continual deployment and reputation as a reliable application server, nginx for its reputation as a fast and stable reverse-proxy. We also took advantage of the Amazon CloudFront CDN here to further improve performance by caching static assets globally.

        We tried to strike a balance between having control over management and configuration of our core application with the convenience of being able to leverage AWS hosted services for ancillary functions (Amazon SES , Amazon SQS Amazon Route 53 all hosted securely inside Amazon VPC of course!).

        Whilst there is some compromise here with potential vendor lock in, the tasks being performed by these ancillary services are no particularly specialised which should mitigate this risk. Furthermore we have already containerised the stack in our development using Docker environment, and looking to how best to bring this into production - potentially using Amazon EC2 Container Service

        See more
        Chris McFadden
        Chris McFadden
        VP, Engineering at SparkPost · | 7 upvotes · 62.2K views
        atSparkPostSparkPost
        Lua
        Lua
        OpenResty
        OpenResty
        nginx
        nginx

        We use nginx and OpenResty as our API proxy running on EC2 for auth, caching, and some rate limiting for our dozens of microservices. Since OpenResty support embedded Lua we were able to write a custom access module that calls out to our authentication service with the resource, method, and access token. If that succeeds then critical account info is passed down to the underlying microservice. This proxy approach keeps all authentication and authorization in one place and provides a unified CX for our API users. Nginx is fast and cheap to run though we are always exploring alternatives that are also economical. What do you use?

        See more
        nginx
        nginx

        I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

        See more
        Marcel Kornegoor
        Marcel Kornegoor
        CTO at AT Computing · | 6 upvotes · 13.8K views
        Apache HTTP Server
        Apache HTTP Server
        nginx
        nginx

        nginx or Apache HTTP Server that's the question. The best choice depends on what it needs to serve. In general, Nginx performs better with static content, where Apache and Nginx score roughly the same when it comes to dynamic content. Since most webpages and web-applications use both static and dynamic content, a combination of both platforms may be the best solution.

        Since both webservers are easy to deploy and free to use, setting up a performance or feature comparison test is no big deal. This way you can see what solutions suits your application or content best. Don't forget to look at other aspects, like security, back-end compatibility (easy of integration) and manageability, as well.

        A reasonably good comparison between the two can be found in the link below.

        See more
        Interest over time
        Reviews of nginx and Websphere
        No reviews found
        How developers use nginx and Websphere
        Avatar of MaxCDN
        MaxCDN uses nginxnginx

        The original API performed a synchronous Nginx reload after provisioning a zone, which often took up to 30 seconds or longer. While important, this step shouldn’t block the response to the user (or API) that a new zone has been created, or block subsequent requests to adjust the zone. With the new API, an independent worker reloads Nginx configurations based on zone modifications.It’s like ordering a product online: don’t pause the purchase process until the product’s been shipped. Say the order has been created, and you can still cancel or modify shipping information. Meanwhile, the remaining steps are being handled behind the scenes. In our case, the zone provision happens instantly, and you can see the result in your control panel or API. Behind the scenes, the zone will be serving traffic within a minute.

        Avatar of Cloudcraft
        Cloudcraft uses nginxnginx

        Nginx serves as the loadbalancer, router and SSL terminator of cloudcraft.co. As one of our app server nodes is spun up, an Ansible orchestration script adds the new node dynamically to the nginx loadbalancer config which is then reloaded for a zero downtime seamless rolling deployment. By putting nginx in front or whatever web and API servers you might have, you gain a ton of flexibility. While previously I've cobbled together HAProxy and Stun as a poor man's loadbalancer, nginx just does a much better job and is far simpler in the long run.

        Avatar of datapile
        datapile uses nginxnginx

        Used nginx as exactly what it is great for: serving static content in a cache-friendly, load balanced manner.

        It is exclusively for production web page hosting, we don't use nginx internally, only on the public-facing versions of static sites / Angular & Backbone/Marionette applications.

        Avatar of Pēteris Caune
        Pēteris Caune uses nginxnginx

        We use NGINX both as reverse HTTP proxy and also as a SMTP proxy, to handle incoming email.

        We previously handled incoming email with Mandrill, and then later with AWS SES. Handling incoming email yourself is not that much more difficult and saves quite a bit on operational costs.

        Avatar of Wirkn Inc.
        Wirkn Inc. uses nginxnginx

        NGINX sits in front of all of our web servers. It is fantastic at load balancing traffic as well as serving as a cache at times when under massive load. It's a robust tool that we're happy to have at the front lines of all Wirkn web apps.

        How much does nginx cost?
        How much does Websphere cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable
        News about Websphere
        More news