StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Websphere vs nginx

Websphere vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Websphere
Websphere
Stacks99
Followers92
Votes0

Websphere vs nginx: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Websphere and Nginx

Websphere and Nginx are two popular web server software that offer different features and functionality. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Architecture: Websphere is a Java-based application server, while Nginx is a lightweight web server and reverse proxy server. Websphere provides a full Java EE platform, including support for enterprise features like distributed transactions and messaging. Nginx, on the other hand, is designed to handle high concurrency and provide fast and efficient serving of static content.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Websphere is known for its ability to handle large enterprise applications and scale horizontally by adding more servers. It provides clustering and load balancing capabilities to distribute the workload across multiple instances. Nginx, on the other hand, is highly scalable and performs well in terms of handling high traffic loads and concurrent connections, making it ideal for serving static content and acting as a reverse proxy.

  3. Configuration and Flexibility: Websphere offers a comprehensive and complex configuration system that allows fine-grained control over application deployment and management. It provides a graphical interface for administration tasks and requires a steep learning curve. On the other hand, Nginx offers a simpler and more flexible configuration using a declarative language. Its configuration is easy to understand and allows for quick changes and updates.

  4. Open Source vs Commercial License: Nginx is an open-source web server software released under a 2-clause BSD license. This means it is free to use and modify, making it popular among developers and small businesses. Websphere, on the other hand, is a commercial product offered by IBM and requires a paid license for usage, which makes it more suitable for larger enterprises with specific requirements and support needs.

  5. Community and Support: Nginx has a large and active community of developers, which means there are many resources available online to help with troubleshooting, customization, and integration with other software. It has a wide range of third-party modules and extensions developed by the community. Websphere, being a commercial product, has dedicated support from IBM, which can be advantageous for enterprises that require professional assistance and support.

  6. Platform Compatibility: Websphere is designed to run on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, AIX, and z/OS. It provides a consistent runtime environment across different platforms. Nginx, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Unix-like systems, although it is also compatible with Windows. It is lightweight and can run on resource-constrained systems, making it suitable for containers and cloud deployments.

In Summary, Websphere is a Java-based enterprise application server with advanced features and scalability, while Nginx is a lightweight and high-performance web server with a simple and flexible configuration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Websphere

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Websphere
Websphere

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
99
Followers
61.9K
Followers
92
Votes
5.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Websphere?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase