Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Redis vs SAP HANA: What are the differences?
Redis vs SAP HANA
Redis and SAP HANA are both popular in-memory data stores used in different scenarios. While they have some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart from each other. In this article, we will explore six key differences between Redis and SAP HANA.
Data Model: Redis is a key-value store that allows you to store simple data structures like strings, lists, sets, and hashes. On the other hand, SAP HANA is a fully-fledged relational database management system (RDBMS) that supports SQL queries and complex data models like tables, views, and stored procedures. This makes SAP HANA suitable for handling structured data and performing sophisticated analytics.
Scalability: Redis offers built-in support for distributed caching and data replication, allowing you to scale horizontally by adding more Redis nodes. However, SAP HANA provides scaling options through vertical and horizontal scaling, allowing you to increase the computational power and storage capacity of the system as your needs grow. SAP HANA's scalability options make it more suitable for handling large volumes of data and complex workloads.
Query Language: Redis does not have a built-in query language like SQL. Instead, it provides a set of commands for data manipulation and retrieval. In contrast, SAP HANA uses SQL as its query language, allowing you to perform complex queries and aggregations on the data stored in the system. SQL's expressive power makes SAP HANA a more flexible choice for querying and analyzing data.
Data Persistence: Redis offers both in-memory and disk-based data persistence options. You can configure Redis to periodically save snapshots of the in-memory data to disk or append changes to a log file for durability. On the other hand, SAP HANA stores data persistently on disk by default, ensuring data durability even in the event of a system failure. This makes SAP HANA more suitable for storing critical and persistent data.
Use Cases: Redis is commonly used for caching, session management, and real-time analytics due to its low latency and high throughput capabilities. Its simplicity and fast data access make it a good choice for applications that require rapid data retrieval. However, SAP HANA is preferred for scenarios that involve complex data processing, predictive analytics, and real-time data integration. Its advanced features enable businesses to derive actionable insights from their data and make data-driven decisions.
Cost: Redis is an open-source solution that can be used free of charge. However, if you require additional features or enterprise-level support, you may need to purchase a commercial license or subscribe to a managed Redis service. On the other hand, SAP HANA is a proprietary software that requires licensing fees. The cost of SAP HANA can vary depending on the edition and deployment options chosen. It is essential to consider the overall cost of ownership when deciding between Redis and SAP HANA.
In summary, Redis and SAP HANA differ in terms of their data model, scalability options, query language, data persistence, use cases, and cost. Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting the right data store based on the specific requirements and constraints of your application or system.
Pros of Redis
- Performance886
- Super fast542
- Ease of use513
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable164
- Free155
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Great community22
- Pub/Sub22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- NoSQL10
- Lists10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Bitmaps8
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Open Source7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Transactions4
- Outstanding performance4
- Runs server side LUA4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- Networked4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Scalable2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Simple2
Pros of SAP HANA
- In-memory5
- SQL5
- Distributed4
- Performance4
- Realtime2
- Concurrent2
- OLAP2
- OLTP2
- JSON1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1