StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Rubygems Packages
  5. cancancan vs pundit

cancancan vs pundit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

cancancan
cancancan
Stacks69
Followers2
Votes0
GitHub Stars5.4K
Forks628
pundit
pundit
Stacks81
Followers1
Votes0
GitHub Stars8.1K
Forks626

cancancan vs pundit: What are the differences?

Comparing cancancan and pundit

CanCanCan and Pundit are both Ruby gems used for authorization in web applications. While they have similar purposes, there are several key differences between the two:

  1. Authorization Model: CanCanCan uses an ability-based authorization model, where the developer defines abilities for different user roles. These abilities determine what actions a user can perform on different resources. On the other hand, Pundit follows a policy-based authorization model, where the developer defines policies for different actions on resources. Policies determine whether a user is allowed to perform a particular action on a resource.

  2. Authorization Syntax: CanCanCan uses a DSL (domain-specific language) for defining abilities in a separate Ability class. The DSL has methods like can and cannot to define permissions. Pundit, on the other hand, uses plain Ruby classes to define policies. These classes have methods like index?, create?, etc., which return a boolean value to indicate whether the user can perform the corresponding action.

  3. Flexibility: CanCanCan provides a range of helper methods and conventions to simplify the authorization process. It also supports nested resource authorization and provides an easy way to handle authorization errors. Pundit, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and minimalism. It gives developers more control over the authorization process by allowing them to define their own policies and conditions.

  4. Integration: CanCanCan integrates well with popular frameworks like Ruby on Rails and supports various ORMs (Object-Relational Mapping). Pundit also integrates with Rails but is ORM-agnostic, which means it can be used with any ORM. Pundit also provides a clearer separation of concerns by keeping authorization logic separate from controller actions.

  5. Community Support and Maintenance: CanCanCan has a larger community and has been around for a longer time. It is actively maintained and frequently updated with bug fixes and new features. Pundit, though relatively newer, also has a strong community and active maintenance.

  6. Learning Curve: CanCanCan has a smoother learning curve for developers who are new to authorization. The DSL and convention-based approach make it easier to understand and implement. Pundit, while more flexible, may have a steeper learning curve due to its policy-based approach, where the developer has to define policies explicitly.

In summary, CanCanCan and Pundit are both powerful authorization gems for Ruby applications. CanCanCan follows an ability-based authorization model, uses a DSL, provides more convention and helper methods, and has better integration with frameworks like Rails. Pundit, on the other hand, follows a policy-based authorization model, uses plain Ruby classes, provides more flexibility, and allows developers more control over the authorization process.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

cancancan
cancancan
pundit
pundit

Simple authorization solution for Rails. All permissions are stored in a single location.

Object oriented authorization for Rails applications.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.4K
GitHub Stars
8.1K
GitHub Forks
628
GitHub Forks
626
Stacks
69
Stacks
81
Followers
2
Followers
1
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to cancancan, pundit?

rake

rake

Rake is a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. Rake has the following features: * Rakefiles (rake's version of Makefiles) are completely defined in standard Ruby syntax. No XML files to edit. No quirky Makefile syntax to worry about (is that a tab or a space?) * Users can specify tasks with prerequisites. * Rake supports rule patterns to synthesize implicit tasks. * Flexible FileLists that act like arrays but know about manipulating file names and paths. * Supports parallel execution of tasks.

pry

pry

An IRB alternative and runtime developer console.

rspec

rspec

BDD for Ruby.

rails

rails

Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity. It encourages beautiful code by favoring convention over configuration.

simplecov

simplecov

Code coverage for Ruby 1.9+ with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites.

puma

puma

Puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process worker support to support CRuby well.

pg

pg

Pg is the Ruby interface to the {PostgreSQL RDBMS}[http://www.postgresql.org/]. It works with {PostgreSQL 9.2 and later}[http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/]. A small example usage: #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'pg' # Output a table of current connections to the DB conn = PG.connect( dbname: 'sales' ) conn.exec( "SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity" ) do |result| puts " PID | User | Query" result.each do |row| puts " %7d | %-16s | %s " % row.values_at('procpid', 'usename', 'current_query') end end.

rspec-rails

rspec-rails

Rspec-rails is a testing framework for Rails 3+.

rubocop

rubocop

Automatic Ruby code style checking tool. Aims to enforce the community-driven Ruby Style Guide.

byebug

byebug

Byebug is a Ruby debugger. It's implemented using the TracePoint C API for execution control and the Debug Inspector C API for call stack navigation. The core component provides support that front-ends can build on. It provides breakpoint handling and bindings for stack frames among other things and it comes with an easy to use command line interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase