StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Rubygems Packages
  5. elasticsearch vs manticore

elasticsearch vs manticore

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

elasticsearch
elasticsearch
Stacks71
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.9K
Forks601
manticore
manticore
Stacks4
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars54
Forks29

elasticsearch vs manticore: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code provides a comparison between Elasticsearch and Manticore.

1. **Data Storage**: Elasticsearch stores data in JSON format, while Manticore uses an internal binary format, which is more efficient for data retrieval and more secure as it does not expose raw data.
   
2. **Indexing Performance**: Manticore generally has better indexing performance compared to Elasticsearch due to its optimized indexing process and internal data format, making it faster in handling large volumes of data.
   
3. **Search Performance**: Elasticsearch is known for its superior search performance, especially in complex queries and aggregations, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring heavy search functionality.
   
4. **Clustering and Scalability**: Elasticsearch has robust clustering and scalability features, allowing it to easily scale horizontally by adding more nodes to distribute the load, while Manticore's clustering capabilities are less advanced in comparison.
   
5. **Query Language Support**: Elasticsearch supports a wide range of query languages and DSLs, such as Query DSL and Aggregations, providing more flexibility and advanced search capabilities, whereas Manticore has limited query language support.
   
6. **Community and Ecosystem**: Elasticsearch has a larger community and ecosystem with more third-party plugins and integrations available, making it easier to find solutions and support compared to Manticore.

In Summary, the key differences between Elasticsearch and Manticore lie in data storage, indexing performance, search performance, clustering and scalability, query language support, and community and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

elasticsearch
elasticsearch
manticore
manticore

Ruby integrations for Elasticsearch (client, API, etc.).

Manticore is an HTTP client built on the Apache HttpCore components.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.9K
GitHub Stars
54
GitHub Forks
601
GitHub Forks
29
Stacks
71
Stacks
4
Followers
0
Followers
0
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to elasticsearch, manticore?

rake

rake

Rake is a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. Rake has the following features: * Rakefiles (rake's version of Makefiles) are completely defined in standard Ruby syntax. No XML files to edit. No quirky Makefile syntax to worry about (is that a tab or a space?) * Users can specify tasks with prerequisites. * Rake supports rule patterns to synthesize implicit tasks. * Flexible FileLists that act like arrays but know about manipulating file names and paths. * Supports parallel execution of tasks.

pry

pry

An IRB alternative and runtime developer console.

rspec

rspec

BDD for Ruby.

rails

rails

Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity. It encourages beautiful code by favoring convention over configuration.

simplecov

simplecov

Code coverage for Ruby 1.9+ with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites.

puma

puma

Puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process worker support to support CRuby well.

pg

pg

Pg is the Ruby interface to the {PostgreSQL RDBMS}[http://www.postgresql.org/]. It works with {PostgreSQL 9.2 and later}[http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/]. A small example usage: #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'pg' # Output a table of current connections to the DB conn = PG.connect( dbname: 'sales' ) conn.exec( "SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity" ) do |result| puts " PID | User | Query" result.each do |row| puts " %7d | %-16s | %s " % row.values_at('procpid', 'usename', 'current_query') end end.

rspec-rails

rspec-rails

Rspec-rails is a testing framework for Rails 3+.

rubocop

rubocop

Automatic Ruby code style checking tool. Aims to enforce the community-driven Ruby Style Guide.

byebug

byebug

Byebug is a Ruby debugger. It's implemented using the TracePoint C API for execution control and the Debug Inspector C API for call stack navigation. The core component provides support that front-ends can build on. It provides breakpoint handling and bindings for stack frames among other things and it comes with an easy to use command line interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase