rails vs react-rails | What are the differences? | StackShare

rails vs react-rails

Overview

rails

Stacks771

Followers95

Votes0

GitHub Stars53.9K

Forks21.5K

react-rails

Stacks8

Followers0

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.7K

Forks797

react-rails vs rails: What are the differences?

Developers describe react-rails as "Render components in views or controller actions". Render components in views or controller actions. Server-side rendering powered by ExecJS. Transform JSX in the asset pipeline or use Webpacker. On the other hand, rails is detailed as "Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity". Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity. It encourages beautiful code by favoring convention over configuration.

react-rails and rails can be primarily classified as "RubyGems Packages" tools.

react-rails and rails are both open source tools. It seems that rails with 48.4K GitHub stars and 19.4K forks on GitHub has more adoption than react-rails with 6.28K GitHub stars and 730 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Languages on StackShare

Flyde Languages

An open-source visual programming language

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

1 0

Detailed Comparison

rails	react-rails
Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity. It encourages beautiful code by favoring convention over configuration.	Render components in views or controller actions. Server-side rendering powered by ExecJS. Transform JSX in the asset pipeline or use Webpacker.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 53.9K	GitHub Stars 6.7K
GitHub Forks 21.5K	GitHub Forks 797
Stacks 771	Stacks 8
Followers 95	Followers 0
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to rails, react-rails?

rake

Rake is a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. Rake has the following features: * Rakefiles (rake's version of Makefiles) are completely defined in standard Ruby syntax. No XML files to edit. No quirky Makefile syntax to worry about (is that a tab or a space?) * Users can specify tasks with prerequisites. * Rake supports rule patterns to synthesize implicit tasks. * Flexible FileLists that act like arrays but know about manipulating file names and paths. * Supports parallel execution of tasks.

rspec

BDD for Ruby.

pry

An IRB alternative and runtime developer console.

simplecov

Code coverage for Ruby 1.9+ with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites.

aws

AWS Ruby Library for interfacing with Amazon Web Services including EC2, S3, SQS, SimpleDB and most of their other services as well. By http://www.appoxy.com.

rubocop

Automatic Ruby code style checking tool. Aims to enforce the community-driven Ruby Style Guide.

sqlite3

This module allows Ruby programs to interface with the SQLite3 database engine (http://www.sqlite.org). You must have the SQLite engine installed in order to build this module. Note that this module is only compatible with SQLite 3.6.16 or newer.

jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

puma

Puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process worker support to support CRuby well.

minitest

Minitest provides a complete suite of testing facilities supporting TDD, BDD, mocking, and benchmarking. "I had a class with Jim Weirich on testing last week and we were allowed to choose our testing frameworks. Kirk Haines and I were paired up and we cracked open the code for a few test frameworks... I MUST say that minitest is *very* readable / understandable compared to the 'other two' options we looked at. Nicely done and thank you for helping us keep our mental sanity." -- Wayne E. Seguin minitest/test is a small and incredibly fast unit testing framework. It provides a rich set of assertions to make your tests clean and readable. minitest/spec is a functionally complete spec engine. It hooks onto minitest/test and seamlessly bridges test assertions over to spec expectations. minitest/benchmark is an awesome way to assert the performance of your algorithms in a repeatable manner. Now you can assert that your newb co-worker doesn't replace your linear algorithm with an exponential one! minitest/mock by Steven Baker, is a beautifully tiny mock (and stub) object framework. minitest/pride shows pride in testing and adds coloring to your test output. I guess it is an example of how to write IO pipes too. :P minitest/test is meant to have a clean implementation for language implementors that need a minimal set of methods to bootstrap a working test suite. For example, there is no magic involved for test-case discovery. "Again, I can't praise enough the idea of a testing/specing framework that I can actually read in full in one sitting!" -- Piotr Szotkowski Comparing to rspec: rspec is a testing DSL. minitest is ruby. -- Adam Hawkins, "Bow Before MiniTest" minitest doesn't reinvent anything that ruby already provides, like: classes, modules, inheritance, methods. This means you only have to learn ruby to use minitest and all of your regular OO practices like extract-method refactorings still apply.