Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Tomcat vs Uvicorn: What are the differences?
- 1. Language: Apache Tomcat is written in Java programming language while Uvicorn is written in Python programming language. This difference in programming language affects the tools, libraries, and ecosystem that are available for each server.
- 2. Server Type: Apache Tomcat is a Java-based web server and servlet container, whereas Uvicorn is an ASGI server that is specifically designed for running Python web applications.
- 3. Performance: Apache Tomcat is known for its scalability, stability, and high-performance capabilities, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications with heavy traffic. On the other hand, Uvicorn is designed to be lightweight and fast, making it more suitable for small to medium-sized applications with moderate traffic.
- 4. Deployment: Apache Tomcat requires the deployment of applications as pre-compiled WAR files, which adds an additional step to the deployment process. Uvicorn, on the other hand, supports various deployment methods, including the use of Docker containers and virtual environments, simplifying the deployment process.
- 5. Ecosystem: Apache Tomcat has a rich ecosystem with a wide range of libraries, frameworks, and tools built specifically for Java web development. Uvicorn, being a Python-based server, benefits from the extensive Python ecosystem, including libraries like Django and Flask, making it easier to develop web applications using these frameworks.
- 6. Configurability: Apache Tomcat provides a wide range of configuration options and supports various protocols and connectors, allowing for flexible customization of the server settings. Uvicorn, on the other hand, focuses on simplicity and ease of use, providing a minimalistic configuration approach that is suitable for most Python web applications.
In Summary, Apache Tomcat and Uvicorn differ in the programming language, server type, performance, deployment process, ecosystem, and configurability.
I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to 1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly. 2. Install apache and tomcat. 3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server. 4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports. 5. Create users on RHEL for application support team. 6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.
I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.
Pros of Apache Tomcat
- Easy79
- Java72
- Popular49
- Spring web1
Pros of Uvicorn
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Tomcat
- Blocking - each http request block a thread3
- Easy to set up2