Two.js vs Underscore

Overview

Underscore

Stacks1.9K

Followers589

Votes290

GitHub Stars27.4K

Forks5.5K

Two.js

Stacks6

Followers25

Votes0

GitHub Stars8.5K

Forks462

Two.js vs Underscore: What are the differences?

Library Purpose: Two.js is a library focused on 2D drawing and animation capabilities, providing a wide range of functionalities for creating interactive graphics. In contrast, Underscore is a utility library that provides a set of functions to work with arrays, collections, and objects in JavaScript.
Main Focus: Two.js prioritizes visualizations and graphics, offering tools specifically designed for creating visually appealing content such as shapes, paths, and animations. Underscore, on the other hand, focuses on enhancing the functionality of JavaScript by providing additional methods for manipulating and handling data structures.
Programming Paradigm: Two.js is primarily used in the context of front-end development, particularly for web design and visual effects. Underscore, on the other hand, can be employed in various programming paradigms including functional programming, object-oriented programming, and procedural programming.
Dependencies: Two.js has dependencies on WebGL and SVG technologies to render graphics on the browser, requiring a certain level of browser support and compatibility. Underscore, being a pure utility library, has minimal dependencies and can be easily integrated into any JavaScript project without external requirements.
Community Support: Two.js has a specific community of users interested in graphics and visual arts, offering resources and documentation tailored towards these types of projects. Underscore, in comparison, has a larger and more diverse community due to its general-purpose utility functions, providing a wider range of examples, tutorials, and support forums.
Learning Curve: Two.js may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its focus on graphics and animations, requiring an understanding of concepts such as vectors, shapes, and rendering. Underscore, with its more straightforward utility functions, may be easier to grasp for individuals new to JavaScript development.

In Summary, Two.js and Underscore differ in their purposes, focus, programming paradigms, dependencies, community support, and learning curve, catering to distinct needs in the realm of JavaScript development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Underscore, Two.js

Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Underscore	Two.js
A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.	It is a two-dimensional drawing API geared towards modern web browsers. It is renderer agnostic enabling the same api to draw in multiple contexts: svg, canvas, and webgl.
-	Focus on Vector Shapes; Scenegraph; Animation ; SVG Interpreter
Statistics
GitHub Stars 27.4K	GitHub Stars 8.5K
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks 462
Stacks 1.9K	Stacks 6
Followers 589	Followers 25
Votes 290	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 85 Utility 55 Simple 40 Functional programming 32 Fast 28 Open source	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Underscore, Two.js?

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Lodash

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Two.js vs Underscore: What are the differences?

Library Purpose: Two.js is a library focused on 2D drawing and animation capabilities, providing a wide range of functionalities for creating interactive graphics. In contrast, Underscore is a utility library that provides a set of functions to work with arrays, collections, and objects in JavaScript.
Main Focus: Two.js prioritizes visualizations and graphics, offering tools specifically designed for creating visually appealing content such as shapes, paths, and animations. Underscore, on the other hand, focuses on enhancing the functionality of JavaScript by providing additional methods for manipulating and handling data structures.
Programming Paradigm: Two.js is primarily used in the context of front-end development, particularly for web design and visual effects. Underscore, on the other hand, can be employed in various programming paradigms including functional programming, object-oriented programming, and procedural programming.
Dependencies: Two.js has dependencies on WebGL and SVG technologies to render graphics on the browser, requiring a certain level of browser support and compatibility. Underscore, being a pure utility library, has minimal dependencies and can be easily integrated into any JavaScript project without external requirements.
Community Support: Two.js has a specific community of users interested in graphics and visual arts, offering resources and documentation tailored towards these types of projects. Underscore, in comparison, has a larger and more diverse community due to its general-purpose utility functions, providing a wider range of examples, tutorials, and support forums.
Learning Curve: Two.js may have a steeper learning curve for beginners due to its focus on graphics and animations, requiring an understanding of concepts such as vectors, shapes, and rendering. Underscore, with its more straightforward utility functions, may be easier to grasp for individuals new to JavaScript development.

Two.js vs Underscore

Overview