StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Websphere

Apache Tomcat vs Websphere

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
Websphere
Websphere
Stacks99
Followers92
Votes0

Apache Tomcat vs Websphere: What are the differences?

Key differences between Apache Tomcat and Websphere:

Apache Tomcat is a web server and servlet container, while Websphere is a full-fledged Java EE application server developed by IBM. The main differences between them can be summarized as follows:

  1. Scalability and Performance: Websphere is designed for enterprise-level applications and offers advanced features for scalability and performance, such as clustering and load balancing. On the other hand, Apache Tomcat is lightweight and more suitable for small to medium-sized applications.

  2. Features and Functionality: Websphere provides a comprehensive set of features and functionalities, including support for various Java EE technologies, messaging systems, and integration with other IBM products. Apache Tomcat, on the other hand, focuses on providing a minimalistic and efficient servlet container without the additional enterprise-level features.

  3. Administration and Management: Websphere offers a rich set of administration and management tools, including a web-based console and command-line interfaces. It provides advanced capabilities for monitoring, configuring, and deploying applications. Apache Tomcat, while it does provide basic management features, lacks the extensive administration capabilities offered by Websphere.

  4. Support and Documentation: Websphere is a commercial product developed by IBM, which means it comes with comprehensive support options and extensive documentation. Apache Tomcat, being an open-source project, relies on community support and may have fewer official resources available.

  5. Cost: Websphere is a commercial product and typically requires a license fee for its usage. Apache Tomcat, being an open-source project, is free to use. This cost difference can be a significant factor for organizations considering the use of these technologies.

  6. Ease of Use: Apache Tomcat is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It has a small memory footprint and can be easily set up and configured. Websphere, while it offers more advanced features, can be more complex to install, configure, and manage.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is a lightweight, free, and easy-to-use servlet container, suitable for small to medium-sized applications. Websphere, on the other hand, is a full-fledged Java EE application server tailored for enterprise-level applications, offering advanced scalability, performance, and management features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, Websphere

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Websphere
Websphere

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

It is a highly scalable, secure and reliable Java EE runtime environment designed to host applications and microservices for any size organization. It supports the Java EE, Jakarta EE and MicroProfile standards-based programming models.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
99
Followers
12.6K
Followers
92
Votes
201
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, Websphere?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase