Alternatives to Zimbra logo

Alternatives to Zimbra

iRedMail, Gmail, Postfix, G Suite, and Roundcube are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Zimbra.
43
128
+ 1
0

What is Zimbra and what are its top alternatives?

Zimbra is an email and collaboration platform that offers features such as email, calendar, contacts, task management, and file sharing. It supports multiple devices and operating systems, providing a unified communication experience. However, Zimbra can be complex to set up and manage, and some users may find the interface overwhelming.

  1. Microsoft Exchange: Microsoft Exchange is a widely used email and collaboration platform that offers email, calendar, contacts, and task management. It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft products. Pros include strong security features and integration with Microsoft Office. Cons include a higher cost compared to Zimbra.
  2. G Suite: G Suite, now Google Workspace, is a cloud-based productivity suite that includes Gmail, Google Calendar, Google Drive, and more. Key features include real-time collaboration and integration with other Google services. Pros include ease of use and scalability. Cons include the dependency on internet connectivity.
  3. Office 365: Office 365 is a cloud-based suite of productivity tools by Microsoft, including Outlook for email and calendar management. It offers features similar to Zimbra with the familiarity of Microsoft products. Pros include seamless integration with Microsoft software. Cons include potential security vulnerabilities.
  4. Zoho Mail: Zoho Mail is an email hosting service that provides email, calendar, contacts, and tasks. It offers a clean interface and strong security features. Pros include easy integration with other Zoho services. Cons include limited storage capacity in the free plan.
  5. ProtonMail: ProtonMail is an encrypted email service focused on security and privacy. It offers end-to-end encryption and features like self-destructing emails. Pros include strong privacy features. Cons include limited features compared to Zimbra.
  6. Roundcube: Roundcube is an open-source web-based email client that can be integrated with email servers like Zimbra. It offers a simple and customizable interface with basic email features. Pros include open-source nature and easy customization. Cons include limited functionality beyond email.
  7. MailCow: MailCow is a self-hosted mail server software that provides email, contacts, and calendar features. It is open-source and offers robust security options. Pros include full control over data privacy. Cons include the need for technical expertise for setup and maintenance.
  8. Fastmail: Fastmail is a secure email service provider that offers features like email, calendar, and contacts. It focuses on privacy and ease of use. Pros include fast and reliable service. Cons include pricing compared to Zimbra.
  9. IceWarp: IceWarp is an all-in-one collaboration platform that includes email, chat, file sharing, and more. It offers a user-friendly interface and strong security features. Pros include a wide range of collaboration tools. Cons include pricing for advanced features.
  10. Kolab: Kolab is an open-source groupware suite that provides email, calendar, and file sharing features. It focuses on privacy and data ownership with self-hosting options. Pros include open-source nature and strong security features. Cons include complexity in setup and configuration.

Top Alternatives to Zimbra

  • iRedMail
    iRedMail

    It is a free, open source mail server solution for your favourite Linux/BSD. You can deploy an open source, fully fledged, full-featured mail server in several minutes, for free. ...

  • Gmail
    Gmail

    An easy to use email app that saves you time and keeps your messages safe. Get your messages instantly via push notifications, read and respond online & offline, and find any message quickly. ...

  • Postfix
    Postfix

    It is a free and open-source mail transfer agent that routes and delivers electronic mail. It is Wietse Venema's mail server that started life at IBM research as an alternative to the widely-used Sendmail program. Now at Google, Wietse continues to support it. ...

  • G Suite
    G Suite

    An integrated suite of secure, cloud-native collaboration and productivity apps. It includes Gmail, Docs, Drive, Calendar, Meet and more. ...

  • Roundcube
    Roundcube

    It is a browser-based multilingual IMAP client with an application-like user interface. It provides full functionality you expect from an email client, including MIME support, address book, folder manipulation, message searching and spell checking. ...

  • JavaScript
    JavaScript

    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. ...

  • Git
    Git

    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. ...

  • GitHub
    GitHub

    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together. ...

Zimbra alternatives & related posts

iRedMail logo

iRedMail

15
94
0
Open Source Mail Server Solution
15
94
+ 1
0
PROS OF IREDMAIL
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF IREDMAIL
      Be the first to leave a con

      related iRedMail posts

      Gmail logo

      Gmail

      125.6K
      75.9K
      32
      A free web-based e-mail service
      125.6K
      75.9K
      + 1
      32
      PROS OF GMAIL
      • 21
        Its free
      • 7
        User-friendly
      • 2
        Nice UI
      • 2
        Snooze
      CONS OF GMAIL
      • 4
        Can't unsend, add open trackers or read recipients

      related Gmail posts

      Hi everyone, I am building a React website with Next.js, and I am trying to connect the contact form with the backend in order to receive the entered value into my emails, Do you have any advice on which email service or back-end service should I use, preferably open source or with free version usage?

      Actual experimentation: I tried to connect my form with Nodemailer package, basically it's working locally but in production on Vercel's server isn't working, it doesn't allow me to receive the data to my email( Gmail) as I am receiving it in localHost, and also email.js as far as I tried isn't a good match for my contact form since it can’t send all the data, only the message value; I would really appreciate if I can get any advice or suggestions; Thanks and kind regards!

      Moussa

      See more

      Hi! I am trying to decide between using Calendly or Meetingbird for my consultancy. I would like to connect 3/4 calendars (via Gmail / G Suite) and primarily use Zoom as my connection platform. I'd love to hear about what others use and your recommendations/points to consider. TIA!

      See more
      Postfix logo

      Postfix

      134
      127
      0
      A free and open-source mail transfer agent
      134
      127
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF POSTFIX
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF POSTFIX
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Postfix posts

          G Suite logo

          G Suite

          31.4K
          15K
          2.5K
          Collaboration and productivity apps for Business
          31.4K
          15K
          + 1
          2.5K
          PROS OF G SUITE
          • 609
            Gmail
          • 447
            Google docs
          • 365
            Calendar
          • 284
            Great for startups
          • 230
            Easy to work
          • 115
            Document management & workflow
          • 110
            Very easy to share
          • 80
            No brainer
          • 59
            Google groups
          • 59
            Google scripts & api
          • 22
            Google drive
          • 16
            Popular
          • 13
            No spam, phishing protection
          • 12
            Google Spreadsheets
          • 12
            Easy
          • 10
            Cloud based and collaboration
          • 7
            Simple and fast document creation collaboration
          • 6
            Best Cloud environment ever
          • 5
            Google maps api
          • 3
            Awesome Collaboration Tools
          • 3
            Google-powered Search in Gmail
          • 3
            Geolocation
          • 1
            도메인 단위로 어플을 관리할 수 있고, 클라우드지만 강력한 보안기능과 기기관리 기능을 제공
          • 1
            music
          • 1
            Single sign-on
          • 1
            Simple
          CONS OF G SUITE
          • 6
            Starting to get pricey
          • 4
            Good luck changing domains
          • 1
            Lesser fonts and styling available in mail compose
          • 1
            Long emails get truncated

          related G Suite posts

          Yonas Beshawred

          Using Screenhero via Slack was getting to be pretty horrible. Video and sound quality was often times pretty bad and worst of all the service just wasn't reliable. We all had high hopes when the acquisition went through but ultimately, the product just didn't live up to expectations. We ended up trying Zoom after I had heard about it from some friends at other companies. We noticed the video/sound quality was better, and more importantly it was super reliable. The Slack integration was awesome (just type /zoom and it starts a call)

          You can schedule recurring calls which is helpful. There's a G Suite (Google Calendar) integration which lets you add a Zoom call (w/dial in info + link to web/mobile) with the click of a button.

          Meeting recordings (video and audio) are really nice, you get recordings stored in the cloud on the higher tier plans. One of our engineers, Jerome, actually built a cool little Slack integration using the Slack API and Zoom API so that every time a recording is processed, a link gets posted to the "event-recordings" channel. The iOS app is great too!

          #WebAndVideoConferencing #videochat

          See more
          Nasser Khan
          Product Manager at StackShare · | 13 upvotes · 406.3K views
          Shared insights
          on
          G SuiteG SuiteSlackSlack
          at

          We are highly dependent on G Suite for all our collaboration and productivity needs, from Gmail and Calendar to Sheets and Docs. While it may not be as robust as Microsoft's offerings in those areas, it's totally cloud-based, we've never had any downtime issues and it integrates well with our other tools like Slack. We write and collaborate on all our specs/PRDs in Docs, share analyses via Sheets and handle our meetings via Calendar. #StackDecisionsLaunch #ProductivitySuite #Collaboration #DocumentCollaboration

          See more
          Roundcube logo

          Roundcube

          40
          45
          3
          A web-based IMAP email client
          40
          45
          + 1
          3
          PROS OF ROUNDCUBE
          • 1
            Can customize
          • 1
            Its free
          • 1
            Nice UI
          CONS OF ROUNDCUBE
          • 1
            Can't receive social mails
          • 1
            Sometimes takes some time to receive mails

          related Roundcube posts

          JavaScript logo

          JavaScript

          354.5K
          269.6K
          8.1K
          Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions
          354.5K
          269.6K
          + 1
          8.1K
          PROS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 1.7K
            Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 1.5K
            It's everywhere
          • 1.2K
            Lots of great frameworks
          • 897
            Fast
          • 745
            Light weight
          • 425
            Flexible
          • 392
            You can't get a device today that doesn't run js
          • 286
            Non-blocking i/o
          • 237
            Ubiquitousness
          • 191
            Expressive
          • 55
            Extended functionality to web pages
          • 49
            Relatively easy language
          • 46
            Executed on the client side
          • 30
            Relatively fast to the end user
          • 25
            Pure Javascript
          • 21
            Functional programming
          • 15
            Async
          • 13
            Full-stack
          • 12
            Setup is easy
          • 12
            Future Language of The Web
          • 12
            Its everywhere
          • 11
            Because I love functions
          • 11
            JavaScript is the New PHP
          • 10
            Like it or not, JS is part of the web standard
          • 9
            Expansive community
          • 9
            Everyone use it
          • 9
            Can be used in backend, frontend and DB
          • 9
            Easy
          • 8
            Most Popular Language in the World
          • 8
            Powerful
          • 8
            Can be used both as frontend and backend as well
          • 8
            For the good parts
          • 8
            No need to use PHP
          • 8
            Easy to hire developers
          • 7
            Agile, packages simple to use
          • 7
            Love-hate relationship
          • 7
            Photoshop has 3 JS runtimes built in
          • 7
            Evolution of C
          • 7
            It's fun
          • 7
            Hard not to use
          • 7
            Versitile
          • 7
            Its fun and fast
          • 7
            Nice
          • 7
            Popularized Class-Less Architecture & Lambdas
          • 7
            Supports lambdas and closures
          • 6
            It let's me use Babel & Typescript
          • 6
            Can be used on frontend/backend/Mobile/create PRO Ui
          • 6
            1.6K Can be used on frontend/backend
          • 6
            Client side JS uses the visitors CPU to save Server Res
          • 6
            Easy to make something
          • 5
            Clojurescript
          • 5
            Promise relationship
          • 5
            Stockholm Syndrome
          • 5
            Function expressions are useful for callbacks
          • 5
            Scope manipulation
          • 5
            Everywhere
          • 5
            Client processing
          • 5
            What to add
          • 4
            Because it is so simple and lightweight
          • 4
            Only Programming language on browser
          • 1
            Test
          • 1
            Hard to learn
          • 1
            Test2
          • 1
            Not the best
          • 1
            Easy to understand
          • 1
            Subskill #4
          • 1
            Easy to learn
          • 0
            Hard 彤
          CONS OF JAVASCRIPT
          • 22
            A constant moving target, too much churn
          • 20
            Horribly inconsistent
          • 15
            Javascript is the New PHP
          • 9
            No ability to monitor memory utilitization
          • 8
            Shows Zero output in case of ANY error
          • 7
            Thinks strange results are better than errors
          • 6
            Can be ugly
          • 3
            No GitHub
          • 2
            Slow
          • 0
            HORRIBLE DOCUMENTS, faulty code, repo has bugs

          related JavaScript posts

          Zach Holman

          Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

          But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

          But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

          Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

          See more
          Conor Myhrvold
          Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 11.2M views

          How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

          Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

          Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

          https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

          (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

          Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

          See more
          Git logo

          Git

          293.7K
          175.8K
          6.6K
          Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
          293.7K
          175.8K
          + 1
          6.6K
          PROS OF GIT
          • 1.4K
            Distributed version control system
          • 1.1K
            Efficient branching and merging
          • 959
            Fast
          • 845
            Open source
          • 726
            Better than svn
          • 368
            Great command-line application
          • 306
            Simple
          • 291
            Free
          • 232
            Easy to use
          • 222
            Does not require server
          • 27
            Distributed
          • 22
            Small & Fast
          • 18
            Feature based workflow
          • 15
            Staging Area
          • 13
            Most wide-spread VSC
          • 11
            Role-based codelines
          • 11
            Disposable Experimentation
          • 7
            Frictionless Context Switching
          • 6
            Data Assurance
          • 5
            Efficient
          • 4
            Just awesome
          • 3
            Github integration
          • 3
            Easy branching and merging
          • 2
            Compatible
          • 2
            Flexible
          • 2
            Possible to lose history and commits
          • 1
            Rebase supported natively; reflog; access to plumbing
          • 1
            Light
          • 1
            Team Integration
          • 1
            Fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
          • 1
            Easy
          • 1
            Flexible, easy, Safe, and fast
          • 1
            CLI is great, but the GUI tools are awesome
          • 1
            It's what you do
          • 0
            Phinx
          CONS OF GIT
          • 16
            Hard to learn
          • 11
            Inconsistent command line interface
          • 9
            Easy to lose uncommitted work
          • 7
            Worst documentation ever possibly made
          • 5
            Awful merge handling
          • 3
            Unexistent preventive security flows
          • 3
            Rebase hell
          • 2
            When --force is disabled, cannot rebase
          • 2
            Ironically even die-hard supporters screw up badly
          • 1
            Doesn't scale for big data

          related Git posts

          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 10M views

          Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

          • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
          • Respectively Git as revision control system
          • SourceTree as Git GUI
          • Visual Studio Code as IDE
          • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
          • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
          • SonarQube as quality gate
          • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
          • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
          • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
          • Heroku for deploying in test environments
          • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
          • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
          • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
          • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
          • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

          The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

          • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
          • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
          • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
          • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
          • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
          • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
          See more
          Tymoteusz Paul
          Devops guy at X20X Development LTD · | 23 upvotes · 8.9M views

          Often enough I have to explain my way of going about setting up a CI/CD pipeline with multiple deployment platforms. Since I am a bit tired of yapping the same every single time, I've decided to write it up and share with the world this way, and send people to read it instead ;). I will explain it on "live-example" of how the Rome got built, basing that current methodology exists only of readme.md and wishes of good luck (as it usually is ;)).

          It always starts with an app, whatever it may be and reading the readmes available while Vagrant and VirtualBox is installing and updating. Following that is the first hurdle to go over - convert all the instruction/scripts into Ansible playbook(s), and only stopping when doing a clear vagrant up or vagrant reload we will have a fully working environment. As our Vagrant environment is now functional, it's time to break it! This is the moment to look for how things can be done better (too rigid/too lose versioning? Sloppy environment setup?) and replace them with the right way to do stuff, one that won't bite us in the backside. This is the point, and the best opportunity, to upcycle the existing way of doing dev environment to produce a proper, production-grade product.

          I should probably digress here for a moment and explain why. I firmly believe that the way you deploy production is the same way you should deploy develop, shy of few debugging-friendly setting. This way you avoid the discrepancy between how production work vs how development works, which almost always causes major pains in the back of the neck, and with use of proper tools should mean no more work for the developers. That's why we start with Vagrant as developer boxes should be as easy as vagrant up, but the meat of our product lies in Ansible which will do meat of the work and can be applied to almost anything: AWS, bare metal, docker, LXC, in open net, behind vpn - you name it.

          We must also give proper consideration to monitoring and logging hoovering at this point. My generic answer here is to grab Elasticsearch, Kibana, and Logstash. While for different use cases there may be better solutions, this one is well battle-tested, performs reasonably and is very easy to scale both vertically (within some limits) and horizontally. Logstash rules are easy to write and are well supported in maintenance through Ansible, which as I've mentioned earlier, are at the very core of things, and creating triggers/reports and alerts based on Elastic and Kibana is generally a breeze, including some quite complex aggregations.

          If we are happy with the state of the Ansible it's time to move on and put all those roles and playbooks to work. Namely, we need something to manage our CI/CD pipelines. For me, the choice is obvious: TeamCity. It's modern, robust and unlike most of the light-weight alternatives, it's transparent. What I mean by that is that it doesn't tell you how to do things, doesn't limit your ways to deploy, or test, or package for that matter. Instead, it provides a developer-friendly and rich playground for your pipelines. You can do most the same with Jenkins, but it has a quite dated look and feel to it, while also missing some key functionality that must be brought in via plugins (like quality REST API which comes built-in with TeamCity). It also comes with all the common-handy plugins like Slack or Apache Maven integration.

          The exact flow between CI and CD varies too greatly from one application to another to describe, so I will outline a few rules that guide me in it: 1. Make build steps as small as possible. This way when something breaks, we know exactly where, without needing to dig and root around. 2. All security credentials besides development environment must be sources from individual Vault instances. Keys to those containers should exist only on the CI/CD box and accessible by a few people (the less the better). This is pretty self-explanatory, as anything besides dev may contain sensitive data and, at times, be public-facing. Because of that appropriate security must be present. TeamCity shines in this department with excellent secrets-management. 3. Every part of the build chain shall consume and produce artifacts. If it creates nothing, it likely shouldn't be its own build. This way if any issue shows up with any environment or version, all developer has to do it is grab appropriate artifacts to reproduce the issue locally. 4. Deployment builds should be directly tied to specific Git branches/tags. This enables much easier tracking of what caused an issue, including automated identifying and tagging the author (nothing like automated regression testing!).

          Speaking of deployments, I generally try to keep it simple but also with a close eye on the wallet. Because of that, I am more than happy with AWS or another cloud provider, but also constantly peeking at the loads and do we get the value of what we are paying for. Often enough the pattern of use is not constantly erratic, but rather has a firm baseline which could be migrated away from the cloud and into bare metal boxes. That is another part where this approach strongly triumphs over the common Docker and CircleCI setup, where you are very much tied in to use cloud providers and getting out is expensive. Here to embrace bare-metal hosting all you need is a help of some container-based self-hosting software, my personal preference is with Proxmox and LXC. Following that all you must write are ansible scripts to manage hardware of Proxmox, similar way as you do for Amazon EC2 (ansible supports both greatly) and you are good to go. One does not exclude another, quite the opposite, as they can live in great synergy and cut your costs dramatically (the heavier your base load, the bigger the savings) while providing production-grade resiliency.

          See more
          GitHub logo

          GitHub

          281.7K
          245.9K
          10.3K
          Powerful collaboration, review, and code management for open source and private development projects
          281.7K
          245.9K
          + 1
          10.3K
          PROS OF GITHUB
          • 1.8K
            Open source friendly
          • 1.5K
            Easy source control
          • 1.3K
            Nice UI
          • 1.1K
            Great for team collaboration
          • 867
            Easy setup
          • 504
            Issue tracker
          • 486
            Great community
          • 483
            Remote team collaboration
          • 451
            Great way to share
          • 442
            Pull request and features planning
          • 147
            Just works
          • 132
            Integrated in many tools
          • 121
            Free Public Repos
          • 116
            Github Gists
          • 112
            Github pages
          • 83
            Easy to find repos
          • 62
            Open source
          • 60
            It's free
          • 60
            Easy to find projects
          • 56
            Network effect
          • 49
            Extensive API
          • 43
            Organizations
          • 42
            Branching
          • 34
            Developer Profiles
          • 32
            Git Powered Wikis
          • 30
            Great for collaboration
          • 24
            It's fun
          • 23
            Clean interface and good integrations
          • 22
            Community SDK involvement
          • 20
            Learn from others source code
          • 16
            Because: Git
          • 14
            It integrates directly with Azure
          • 10
            Standard in Open Source collab
          • 10
            Newsfeed
          • 8
            It integrates directly with Hipchat
          • 8
            Fast
          • 8
            Beautiful user experience
          • 7
            Easy to discover new code libraries
          • 6
            Smooth integration
          • 6
            Cloud SCM
          • 6
            Nice API
          • 6
            Graphs
          • 6
            Integrations
          • 6
            It's awesome
          • 5
            Quick Onboarding
          • 5
            Reliable
          • 5
            Remarkable uptime
          • 5
            CI Integration
          • 5
            Hands down best online Git service available
          • 4
            Uses GIT
          • 4
            Version Control
          • 4
            Simple but powerful
          • 4
            Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
          • 4
            Free HTML hosting
          • 4
            Security options
          • 4
            Loved by developers
          • 4
            Easy to use and collaborate with others
          • 3
            Ci
          • 3
            IAM
          • 3
            Nice to use
          • 3
            Easy deployment via SSH
          • 2
            Easy to use
          • 2
            Leads the copycats
          • 2
            All in one development service
          • 2
            Free private repos
          • 2
            Free HTML hostings
          • 2
            Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
          • 2
            Beautiful
          • 2
            Easy source control and everything is backed up
          • 2
            IAM integration
          • 2
            Very Easy to Use
          • 2
            Good tools support
          • 2
            Issues tracker
          • 2
            Never dethroned
          • 2
            Self Hosted
          • 1
            Dasf
          • 1
            Profound
          CONS OF GITHUB
          • 54
            Owned by micrcosoft
          • 38
            Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
          • 15
            Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
          • 10
            API scoping could be better
          • 9
            Only 3 collaborators for private repos
          • 4
            Limited featureset for issue management
          • 3
            Does not have a graph for showing history like git lens
          • 2
            GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
          • 1
            No multilingual interface
          • 1
            Takes a long time to commit
          • 1
            Expensive

          related GitHub posts

          Johnny Bell

          I was building a personal project that I needed to store items in a real time database. I am more comfortable with my Frontend skills than my backend so I didn't want to spend time building out anything in Ruby or Go.

          I stumbled on Firebase by #Google, and it was really all I needed. It had realtime data, an area for storing file uploads and best of all for the amount of data I needed it was free!

          I built out my application using tools I was familiar with, React for the framework, Redux.js to manage my state across components, and styled-components for the styling.

          Now as this was a project I was just working on in my free time for fun I didn't really want to pay for hosting. I did some research and I found Netlify. I had actually seen them at #ReactRally the year before and deployed a Gatsby site to Netlify already.

          Netlify was very easy to setup and link to my GitHub account you select a repo and pretty much with very little configuration you have a live site that will deploy every time you push to master.

          With the selection of these tools I was able to build out my application, connect it to a realtime database, and deploy to a live environment all with $0 spent.

          If you're looking to build out a small app I suggest giving these tools a go as you can get your idea out into the real world for absolutely no cost.

          See more

          Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

          Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

          Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

          Check out the GitHub repo attached

          See more