AdonisJS vs Phoenix Framework

Overview

Phoenix Framework

Stacks1.0K

Followers1.0K

Votes678

GitHub Stars22.6K

Forks3.0K

AdonisJS

Stacks210

Followers456

Votes122

AdonisJS vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

AdonisJS: *A Node.js web framework *. It is a Node.js Framework which is highly focused on developer ergonomics, stability and confidence; Phoenix Framework: Most web frameworks make you choose between speed and a productive environment. Phoenix gives you both. Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

AdonisJS and Phoenix Framework belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Phoenix Framework is an open source tool with 14K GitHub stars and 1.76K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Phoenix Framework's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, Phoenix Framework has a broader approval, being mentioned in 73 company stacks & 46 developers stacks; compared to AdonisJS, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Detailed Comparison

Phoenix Framework	AdonisJS
Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.	It is a Node.js Framework which is highly focused on developer ergonomics, stability and confidence.
-	mvc, orm, service provider, router
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.0K	Stacks 210
Followers 1.0K	Followers 456
Votes 678	Votes 122
Pros & Cons
Pros 120 High performance 76 Super fast 70 Rapid development 62 Open source 60 Erlang VM Cons 6 No jobs 5 Very difficult	Pros 25 Laravel like 24 Easy to learn 23 MVC 21 Beautiful code 10 ORM Mapper Cons 5 Small community 1 Poor documentation
Integrations
Elixir	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Phoenix Framework, AdonisJS?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.