StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. AIOHTTP vs asyncio

AIOHTTP vs asyncio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

asyncio
asyncio
Stacks126
Followers158
Votes13
AIOHTTP
AIOHTTP
Stacks125
Followers143
Votes0
GitHub Stars16.1K
Forks2.2K

AIOHTTP vs asyncio: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AIOHTTP and Asyncio

Introduction: AIOHTTP and asyncio are both Python libraries that are commonly used in web application development. While they are closely related and often used together, they have some key differences that developers should be aware of.

  1. Architecture: AIOHTTP is a web server and client implementation based on the asynchronous framework called asyncio. It provides a higher-level API for building HTTP-based applications. On the other hand, asyncio is a library that provides infrastructure for writing single-threaded concurrent code using coroutines, multiplexing I/O access over sockets and other resources, running network clients and servers, and other concurrency-based primitives.

  2. Concurrency Model: AIOHTTP is designed to handle concurrent requests and responses efficiently using the asyncio event loop. It allows multiple requests to be processed concurrently without blocking the event loop. On the contrary, asyncio allows developers to write asynchronous code using coroutines, which can be used to achieve concurrency without threads. It provides a cooperative multitasking model where functions can be paused and resumed during I/O operations.

  3. HTTP Functionality: AIOHTTP provides an extensive set of tools and features for dealing with HTTP requests and responses. It supports client-side functionality like handling cookies, authentication, and SSL/TLS. It also includes server-side functionality such as routing, middlewares, and WebSocket support. In contrast, asyncio does not provide high-level HTTP functionality out of the box. It focuses more on providing a general framework for writing asynchronous code and does not have built-in support for specific protocols like HTTP.

  4. Ease of Use: AIOHTTP is designed to be user-friendly and provides a simplified API for common web application tasks. It offers a higher-level interface compared to asyncio, which can make it easier for developers to build web applications quickly. On the other hand, asyncio requires a deeper understanding of asynchronous programming concepts and may have a steeper learning curve for beginners.

  5. Compatibility: AIOHTTP is built on top of asyncio and is fully compatible with it. This means that developers can use asyncio libraries and tools seamlessly with AIOHTTP. On the contrary, asyncio can be used independently of AIOHTTP and can be integrated with other frameworks or libraries that support coroutines.

  6. Community and Support: AIOHTTP has a dedicated community and is widely used in production environments. It has a mature codebase and active development, which means that developers can rely on it for building robust web applications. asyncio, being a part of the Python standard library, also has a large community and is well-supported. It benefits from the wider Python ecosystem and provides developers with a solid foundation for writing asynchronous code.

In Summary, AIOHTTP is a high-level web server and client based on asyncio, providing advanced HTTP functionality and ease of use, while asyncio is a lower-level library for writing asynchronous code using coroutines, focusing more on general concurrency and I/O operations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

asyncio
asyncio
AIOHTTP
AIOHTTP

This module provides infrastructure for writing single-threaded concurrent code using coroutines, multiplexing I/O access over sockets and other resources, running network clients and servers, and other related primitives.

It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.

-
asyncio; client; server;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
126
Stacks
125
Followers
158
Followers
143
Votes
13
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Cooperative Multitasking
  • 4
    I/O Wait
  • 3
    Network Call
  • 2
    I/O bound computation
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to asyncio, AIOHTTP?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase