AIOHTTP vs Bottle

Overview

Bottle

Stacks74

Followers55

Votes5

AIOHTTP

Stacks125

Followers143

Votes0

GitHub Stars16.1K

Forks2.2K

AIOHTTP vs Bottle: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AIOHTTP and Bottle

AIOHTTP and Bottle are two popular web frameworks in Python. While they both serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two.

1. Asynchronous Support: AIOHTTP is built specifically for supporting asynchronous programming, making it suitable for handling high-concurrency applications. On the other hand, Bottle does not provide native support for asynchronous programming and is better suited for simpler, non-concurrent applications.

2. Middleware and Plugins: AIOHTTP has built-in support for middleware and plugins, which allows developers to easily add additional functionality to their applications. Bottle also supports middleware, but its plugin ecosystem is not as extensive as AIOHTTP's.

3. Performance: Due to its focus on asynchronous programming, AIOHTTP tends to perform better in high-load scenarios compared to Bottle. This is especially true for applications that require handling a large number of concurrent requests.

4. Ease of Use: Bottle is known for its simplicity and minimalistic approach, making it easy to learn and use for small-scale projects. On the other hand, AIOHTTP has a steeper learning curve and requires a deeper understanding of asynchronous programming concepts.

5. Routing: Both frameworks provide routing functionality, but AIOHTTP offers a more flexible and powerful routing mechanism. It allows developers to use regular expressions, route parameters, and custom matchers, providing greater flexibility in defining routes.

6. Ecosystem: Bottle has a smaller ecosystem compared to AIOHTTP, which means that there are fewer third-party libraries and extensions available. AIOHTTP, being more widely adopted, has a larger community and more resources available for developers to leverage.

In Summary, AIOHTTP and Bottle differ in their support for asynchronous programming, middleware and plugins, performance, ease of use, routing capabilities, and ecosystem size.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bottle, AIOHTTP

Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceon

Python

Nameko

RabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bottle	AIOHTTP
It is distributed as a single file module and has no dependencies other than the Python Standard Library. It has fast and pythonic built-in template engine and support for mako, jinja2 and cheetah templates.	It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.
Fast and pythonic built-in template engine; Built-in HTTP development server	asyncio; client; server;
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 16.1K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.2K
Stacks 74	Stacks 125
Followers 55	Followers 143
Votes 5	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Super easy to use 2 Great documentation 1 Faster	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python Vue.js Jinja	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bottle, AIOHTTP?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

AIOHTTP vs Bottle: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AIOHTTP and Bottle

AIOHTTP and Bottle are two popular web frameworks in Python. While they both serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two.

In Summary, AIOHTTP and Bottle differ in their support for asynchronous programming, middleware and plugins, performance, ease of use, routing capabilities, and ecosystem size.