StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Ambry vs Azure Storage

Ambry vs Azure Storage

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Stacks1.3K
Followers787
Votes52
Ambry
Ambry
Stacks1
Followers4
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks282

Ambry vs Azure Storage: What are the differences?

Ambry and Azure Storage are both popular options for storing data in cloud environments. However, they have key differences that set them apart.

1. **Data Replication**: In Ambry, data replication is implemented within the cluster using a concept known as replicas. Each data partition is replicated across multiple nodes within the cluster. On the other hand, Azure Storage provides data replication at the storage account level, with options for locally redundant storage (LRS), geo-redundant storage (GRS), and zone-redundant storage (ZRS) for higher availability and durability.

2. **Pricing Model**: Ambry typically follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model where users are charged based on their usage of storage and data transfer. Azure Storage offers a more complex pricing structure with different tiers for different storage types (e.g., Blob storage, File storage) and additional charges for data access, data egress, and redundancy options.

3. **Access Control**: Ambry provides access control through authentication mechanisms within the cluster, enabling fine-grained control over data access. In contrast, Azure Storage offers access control through Azure Active Directory integration, allowing for centralized management of access policies and permissions across multiple Azure services.

4. **Data Consistency**: Ambry offers eventual consistency for read operations, meaning that updates may take some time to propagate across replicas. Azure Storage, on the other hand, provides strong consistency guarantees for read and write operations, ensuring that data is always up-to-date and accurate.

5. **Scalability**: Ambry is designed for horizontal scalability, allowing users to add more nodes to the cluster as their storage requirements grow. Azure Storage is also horizontally scalable and can automatically scale to accommodate increased demand, making it easier to handle large amounts of data.

6. **Data Durability**: Ambry focuses on high availability and fault tolerance within the cluster but may not offer the same level of durability as Azure Storage's data redundancy options like GRS or ZRS, which protect against data loss due to hardware failures or disasters.

In Summary, Ambry and Azure Storage differ in their approach to data replication, pricing, access control, data consistency, scalability, and data durability. Each platform offers unique features and capabilities that cater to specific storage and data management needs in cloud environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Ambry
Ambry

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

It is a distributed object store that supports storage of trillion of small immutable objects (50K -100K) as well as billions of large objects. It was specifically designed to store and serve media objects in web companies. However, it can be used as a general purpose storage system to store DB backups, search indexes or business reports.

Blobs, Tables, Queues, and Files;Highly scalable;Durable & highly available;Premium Storage;Designed for developers
Highly available and horizontally scalable; Low latency and high throughput; Optimized for both small and large objects; Cost effective; Easy to use
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
282
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
1
Followers
787
Followers
4
Votes
52
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cost-effective
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
Cons
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Azure Storage, Ambry?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase