StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript Framework Components
  5. Ant Design vs Chakra UI

Ant Design vs Chakra UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ant Design
Ant Design
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes224
GitHub Stars96.5K
Forks53.9K
Chakra UI
Chakra UI
Stacks217
Followers297
Votes18
GitHub Stars39.9K
Forks3.5K

Ant Design vs Chakra UI: What are the differences?

Ant Design and Chakra UI are both popular UI component libraries for building websites. Here are the key differences between the two.

  1. Design philosophy: Ant Design follows a design philosophy that focuses on "middle-of-the-road" aesthetics, providing a more neutral and balanced visual style. On the other hand, Chakra UI adopts a more minimalist and modern design approach, favoring simplicity and cleanliness.

  2. Component customization: Ant Design offers a wide range of pre-designed components with limited customization options. While it provides a smooth out-of-the-box experience, it might be less suitable for developers who require extensive customization. Chakra UI, on the other hand, emphasizes customizability, allowing developers to fine-tune components to match their specific design needs.

  3. Documentation quality: Ant Design boasts comprehensive and well-maintained documentation, making it easier for developers to understand and use the library effectively. Chakra UI, while still maintaining decent documentation, may require additional effort to find specific information and examples.

  4. Integration with other frameworks: Ant Design is primarily designed for integration with React.js, making it an excellent choice for React-based projects. Chakra UI is also React-based but provides official bindings for Vue.js and Nuxt.js as well, which expands its usability for developers working with different frameworks.

  5. Component ecosystem: Ant Design has a larger component ecosystem compared to Chakra UI. This means that Ant Design has a broader selection of ready-to-use components, which can significantly speed up the development process. Chakra UI, although growing rapidly, currently has a smaller component ecosystem, which might require more custom implementation.

  6. Accessibility considerations: Both Ant Design and Chakra UI prioritize accessibility in their design. However, Chakra UI goes a step further by implementing automatic accessibility features in its components. This makes it easier for developers to create accessible web applications without the need for additional efforts.

In summary, Ant Design is a comprehensive and feature-rich design system with a wide range of pre-built components. Chakra UI, on the other hand, is a lightweight and customizable library with a focus on simplicity and developer-friendly APIs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ant Design
Ant Design
Chakra UI
Chakra UI

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
Ease of Styling; Flexible & composable; Dark Mode
Statistics
GitHub Stars
96.5K
GitHub Stars
39.9K
GitHub Forks
53.9K
GitHub Forks
3.5K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
217
Followers
1.7K
Followers
297
Votes
224
Votes
18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of components
  • 33
    Polished and enterprisey look and feel
  • 21
    TypeScript
  • 21
    Easy to integrate
  • 18
    Es6 support
Cons
  • 24
    Less
  • 10
    Large File Size
  • 4
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
Pros
  • 7
    Typescript Support
  • 4
    Accessibility
  • 4
    Responsiveness
  • 3
    Good documentation
Cons
  • 2
    Hard to customise
  • 1
    Styling system
  • 1
    Inflexible token structure
  • 1
    # of components
Integrations
React
React
jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
VueStrap
VueStrap
React
React

What are some alternatives to Ant Design, Chakra UI?

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Angular Universal

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

React Rainbow

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

MD Bootstrap

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

React Router

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Buefy

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Mantine

Mantine

It is an MIT licensed open source React components and hooks library with a focus on usability, accessibility, and developer experience. You can build fully functional accessible web applications faster than ever – it includes more than 120 customizable components and hooks to cover you in any situation.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase