StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript Framework Components
  5. Ant Design vs Emotion

Ant Design vs Emotion

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ant Design
Ant Design
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes224
GitHub Stars96.5K
Forks53.9K
Emotion
Emotion
Stacks313
Followers239
Votes3
GitHub Stars17.9K
Forks1.1K

Ant Design vs Emotion: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown will provide a clear comparison between Ant Design and Emotion in terms of key differences.

1. **Styling Approach**: Ant Design utilizes a predefined set of components and styles for UI elements, offering a consistent and standardized design system. On the other hand, Emotion is a CSS-in-JS library that allows for dynamic styling and theming by writing CSS styles directly in JavaScript within components.
2. **Customization Flexibility**: Ant Design provides limited customization options due to its opinionated design system, making it easier for developers to create consistent interfaces. In contrast, Emotion offers greater flexibility in customizing styles and themes, enabling developers to create unique and diverse designs tailored to specific requirements.
3. **Performance Impact**: Ant Design's pre-built components can lead to a larger bundle size and potential performance overhead, especially when using many components in a project. Emotion, being a CSS-in-JS solution, allows for better optimization of styles and reduced file sizes, resulting in improved performance in some scenarios.
4. **Community Support**: Ant Design has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available to support developers in using the library effectively. Emotion, although gaining popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources, making it potentially challenging for beginners to get started or troubleshoot issues.
5. **Dependency Management**: Ant Design requires developers to include the entire library to utilize its components and styles, which can lead to unnecessary bloat if only a few components are used. Emotion's modular architecture enables developers to include only the specific styling components they need, reducing the overall size and dependencies in the project.
6. **Adoption and Learning Curve**: Ant Design follows a structured and standardized design language, making it easier for developers familiar with its principles to adopt and implement UI components. Emotion's CSS-in-JS approach may have a steeper learning curve for developers not accustomed to writing styles in JavaScript, requiring additional time and effort to master its usage effectively.

In Summary, the key differences between Ant Design and Emotion lie in their styling approach, customization flexibility, performance impact, community support, dependency management, and adoption and learning curve. Each has its strengths and considerations, catering to different preferences and requirements in UI development.```

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ant Design, Emotion

vishal
vishal

Feb 10, 2021

Needs advice

Which framework should I choose? Features that we are looking for:

  • Rapid Development
  • Drag and Drop functionality from Treeview to GridView
  • Better Performance with large data
  • Optimal deployment package
  • Flexible to extend the functionality of any component
  • Supports Lazy Loading, Multi-column sorting, Column Resizing, Virtual scrolling,
215 views215
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ant Design
Ant Design
Emotion
Emotion

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

Emotion is a performant and flexible CSS-in-JS library. Building on many other CSS-in-JS libraries, it allows you to style apps quickly with string or object styles. It has predictable composition to avoid specificity issues with CSS. With source maps and labels, Emotion has a great developer experience and great performance with heavy caching in production.

Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
96.5K
GitHub Stars
17.9K
GitHub Forks
53.9K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
313
Followers
1.7K
Followers
239
Votes
224
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of components
  • 33
    Polished and enterprisey look and feel
  • 21
    Easy to integrate
  • 21
    TypeScript
  • 18
    Es6 support
Cons
  • 24
    Less
  • 10
    Large File Size
  • 4
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
Integrations
React
React
jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
VueStrap
VueStrap
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Ant Design, Emotion?

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Angular Universal

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

React Rainbow

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

MD Bootstrap

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

React Router

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Buefy

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase