StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript Framework Components
  5. Ant Design vs Telerik UI

Ant Design vs Telerik UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ant Design
Ant Design
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.7K
Votes224
GitHub Stars96.5K
Forks53.9K
Telerik UI
Telerik UI
Stacks19
Followers24
Votes0

Ant Design vs Telerik UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing Ant Design and Telerik UI, there are some key differences that developers need to be aware of in order to choose the right UI framework for their project.

  1. Framework Integration: Ant Design is primarily focused on integrating with React, while Telerik UI provides support for multiple frameworks such as Angular, Vue, and jQuery. This makes Telerik UI a more versatile option for developers working across different technologies.

  2. Customization Options: Ant Design offers a wide range of customization options through its extensive library of components and themes. On the other hand, Telerik UI provides a more structured and polished set of components out-of-the-box, making it easier to maintain a consistent UI design across different projects.

  3. Documentation and Support: Ant Design has thorough documentation that is comprehensive and beginner-friendly, making it easier for developers to get started with the framework. In comparison, Telerik UI offers dedicated support and resources for their users, including forums, tutorials, and training materials.

  4. Performance and Scalability: Ant Design is known for its lightweight and efficient components that ensure optimal performance for web applications. Telerik UI, on the other hand, is designed to handle complex and large-scale applications with built-in features for scalability and performance optimization.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Ant Design has a thriving community of developers who contribute to the framework's growth through plugins, extensions, and third-party integrations. Telerik UI, on the other hand, provides a more structured ecosystem with official extensions and integrations to streamline development processes.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Ant Design is an open-source framework that is free to use for commercial projects, while Telerik UI offers both free and paid versions with varying levels of support and features. This difference in pricing models can impact the budget and resources required for implementing each framework.

In Summary, when choosing between Ant Design and Telerik UI, developers should consider factors such as framework integration, customization options, documentation and support, performance and scalability, community ecosystem, and pricing and licensing to determine the best fit for their project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Ant Design
Ant Design
Telerik UI
Telerik UI

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

It includes more than 100 versatile and performance-optimized components that help you build high-quality, professional line-of-business projects. From the leading AJAX data grid to the full-featured HTML editor used by Microsoft on sites like MSDN, It provides you with all the building blocks to maximize productivity and build richer, slicker and better-performing applications with ease.

Cases; Principles; Proximity; Alignment; Contrast; Repetition; Make it Direct; Stay on the Page; Keep it Lightweight; Provide an Invitation; Use Transition; React Immediately; Colors; Icons; Font; Copywriting.
Complete Set of Features and Controls; Seamless UX Across Devices and Browsers; 21 Built-In Professional Grade Skins
Statistics
GitHub Stars
96.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
53.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
19
Followers
1.7K
Followers
24
Votes
224
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 48
    Lots of components
  • 33
    Polished and enterprisey look and feel
  • 21
    TypeScript
  • 21
    Easy to integrate
  • 18
    Es6 support
Cons
  • 24
    Less
  • 10
    Large File Size
  • 4
    Poor accessibility support
  • 3
    Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
jQuery UI
jQuery UI
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
VueStrap
VueStrap
ASP.NET
ASP.NET

What are some alternatives to Ant Design, Telerik UI?

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Angular Universal

Angular Universal

It executes on the server, generating static application pages that later get bootstrapped on the client. This means that the application generally renders more quickly, giving users a chance to view the application layout before it becomes fully interactive.

Angular Material

Angular Material

Sprint from Zero to App. Hit the ground running with comprehensive, modern UI components that work across the web, mobile and desktop. It allows to create material styled angular apps fast and easy.

React Rainbow

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

PrimeReact

PrimeReact

PrimeReact is a rich set of open source UI Components for React.

MD Bootstrap

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

React Router

React Router

React Router is a complete routing solution designed specifically for React.js. It painlessly synchronizes the components of your application with the URL, with first-class support for nesting, transitions, and server side rendering.

styled-components

styled-components

Visual primitives for the component age. Use the best bits of ES6 and CSS to style your apps without stress 💅

Buefy

Buefy

We like to think that Buefy is the javascript layer for your Bulma interface, since it doesn't require for it to be a sophisticated Single-Page Application. You can import it completely or single components on a ordinary webpage and use Vue.js as a replacement for jQuery.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase