StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Task Scheduling
  4. Workflow Manager
  5. Apache Beam vs Apache Oozie

Apache Beam vs Apache Oozie

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Oozie
Apache Oozie
Stacks40
Followers76
Votes0
Apache Beam
Apache Beam
Stacks183
Followers361
Votes14

Apache Beam vs Apache Oozie: What are the differences?

<Apache Beam vs Apache Oozie>

1. **Language Compatibility**: Apache Beam supports multiple programming languages like Java, Python, and Go, making it more versatile for developers to implement their pipelines. In contrast, Apache Oozie is limited to XML, making it less flexible for developers who prefer other languages.
   
2. **Execution Model**: Apache Beam offers both batch and streaming data processing capabilities, allowing for real-time data processing. On the other hand, Apache Oozie primarily focuses on batch processing, making it less suitable for streaming use cases.
   
3. **Native Integration**: Apache Beam natively integrates with various distributed processing engines like Apache Flink, Apache Spark, and Google Cloud Dataflow, offering more options for processing data efficiently. Apache Oozie, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Hadoop ecosystem tools, limiting its compatibility with other processing engines.
   
4. **Workflow Orchestration**: Apache Beam does not have built-in support for workflow orchestration, requiring developers to rely on other tools for managing workflow tasks. In contrast, Apache Oozie provides native support for workflow orchestration, allowing for the scheduling and coordination of complex workflows.
   
5. **Ease of Development**: Apache Beam provides a unified programming model for both batch and streaming processing, simplifying the development process for developers. Apache Oozie, with its XML-based approach, may require more learning curve and effort for developers to create and manage workflows.
   
6. **Community Support**: Apache Beam has a growing community of developers and contributors, providing regular updates, new features, and support for users. Apache Oozie, while established, may have slower community growth and support in comparison. 

In Summary, Apache Beam and Apache Oozie differ in language compatibility, execution model, native integration, workflow orchestration, ease of development, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Oozie
Apache Oozie
Apache Beam
Apache Beam

It is a server-based workflow scheduling system to manage Hadoop jobs. Workflows in it are defined as a collection of control flow and action nodes in a directed acyclic graph. Control flow nodes define the beginning and the end of a workflow as well as a mechanism to control the workflow execution path.

It implements batch and streaming data processing jobs that run on any execution engine. It executes pipelines on multiple execution environments.

Statistics
Stacks
40
Stacks
183
Followers
76
Followers
361
Votes
0
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Cross-platform
  • 5
    Open-source
  • 2
    Unified batch and stream processing
  • 2
    Portable

What are some alternatives to Apache Oozie, Apache Beam?

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Zenaton

Zenaton

Developer framework to orchestrate multiple services and APIs into your software application using logic triggered by events and time. Build ETL processes, A/B testing, real-time alerts and personalized user experiences with custom logic.

Luigi

Luigi

It is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in.

Unito

Unito

Build and map powerful workflows across tools to save your team time. No coding required. Create rules to define what information flows between each of your tools, in minutes.

Shipyard

Shipyard

na

Flow-Like

Flow-Like

Mission-critical automation you can audit, control and run on-prem. No black boxes. No silent failures. No data leaks. Built for teams that cannot afford uncertainty.

ETLR

ETLR

Production-grade workflow automation. No drag-and-drop required. Build, version, and deploy your workflows with YAML.

Fermi Dev

Fermi Dev

Is the AI Operational Brain for Modern Enterprises. Connect your systems, build dynamic models, and automate business processes with intelligent agents.

Vison AI

Vison AI

Hire AI Employees that deliver Human-Quality work. Automate repetitive tasks, scale effortlessly, and focus on business growth without increasing head count.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase