Tornado vs Apache Calcite | What are the differences? | StackShare

Apache Calcite vs Tornado

Overview

Tornado

Stacks530

Followers409

Votes167

GitHub Stars22.3K

Forks5.5K

Apache Calcite

Stacks11

Followers29

Votes0

GitHub Stars5.0K

Forks2.4K

Tornado vs Apache Calcite: What are the differences?

What is Tornado? A Python web framework and asynchronous networking library, originally developed at FriendFeed. By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.

What is Apache Calcite? A dynamic data management framework. It is an open source framework for building databases and data management systems. It includes a SQL parser, an API for building expressions in relational algebra, and a query planning engine.

Tornado and Apache Calcite belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Tornado and Apache Calcite are both open source tools. It seems that Tornado with 18.4K GitHub stars and 5.06K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Apache Calcite with 1.46K GitHub stars and 939 GitHub forks.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

VitePress Frameworks

VitePress

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

Detailed Comparison

Tornado	Apache Calcite
By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.	It is an open source framework for building databases and data management systems. It includes a SQL parser, an API for building expressions in relational algebra, and a query planning engine
-	Sql parsing; Query optimization
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.3K	GitHub Stars 5.0K
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks 2.4K
Stacks 530	Stacks 11
Followers 409	Followers 29
Votes 167	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 37 Open source 31 So fast 27 Great for microservices architecture 20 Websockets 17 Simple Cons 2 Event loop is complicated	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python	jQuery MySQL MongoDB SQLite

What are some alternatives to Tornado, Apache Calcite?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.